Page 27 - Constitution Doesn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And make sure that our rights are still protected. i couldn't agree more that it's concerning that the supreme court, which has tried to avoid being a political branch, so so entrenched in this. and i think people are very concerned. you know, with everyone who has recently been appointed to the court that this is going to be a very partisan, very political decision that could just, you know, unwind so much of the good work that's happened in the courts over the last decades. >> i want to bring in emily gold waldman now. same question to you when it comes to other issues that appear settled he...

His family, all holding guns, just days after that school shooting. we'll get reaction from a parent of one of the kids killed in parkland. omicron now detected in more than a dozen u.s. states. plus, a new requirement for foreign travelers coming into the country takes effect tomorrow. what's next in the fight against the new variant? >> it's clear not just that it's here, but it's spreading. it's just that we haven't known to look to it already. new signs emerge of a possible invasion of ukraine. while president biden prepares for a key meeting with vladimir putin this week. good morni...

And history, that the constitution's neither pro-life nor pro-choice. on the question of abortion, we and they would say, therefore, it should be left to the people, to the states or the congress. and i think they also then continue, because the constitution is neutral, that this court should be scrupulously neutral on the question of abortion, neither pro-choice nor for life. but, because they say that the constitution doesn't give us the authority, we should leave it to the states and we should be scrupulously neutral on the question. and that they are seeing here, i think, that we should re...

It should be left to the people, to the states or to congress, and i think they also then continue because the constitution is neutral, that this court should be scrupulously neutral on the question of abortion. neither pro choice nor pro life, but because they say the constitution doesn't give us the authority, we should leave it to the states. we should be scrupulously neutral on the question, and they are saying here, i think, that we should return to a position of neutrality on that contentious social issue rather than continuing to pick sides on that issue. so i think that's at a big pict...

Interest of a woman is more profound or more consequential. so the waiting is different. if you take a step back from all that what you are essentially pushing for, and policy indiscretion. and it's not you are not doing law, and what are the accommodations that get made between the competing sides, that's legislative work. and that's why i think justice kavanaugh had the best of this by saying, the constitution doesn't have anything to say about abortion one way or the other end if the is a have to be accommodated, and if it's different in new york or alabama then so be it.