Page 38 - Constitution Doesn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> really? >> they don't believe, they don't believe that what he did should be -- especially because we're on the eve of another political remedy. >> so if we weren't on the eve of an election, you're saying they would support impeachment? >> i'm saying that in the clinton instance, there was no remedy. it was in a second term. so that made it more likely if you wanted to try to remedy. in this case there is a remedy that doesn't take it out of the hands of the american people. >> but the constitution doesn't say unless an election is less than a year away. the constitution says you should be...

The same type of corruption. the only differences you had people like adam schiff are trying to negate the parts that you don't like for political convenience, saying things like, well, these are discounted conspiracy theories. we don't have to revisit this. yes we do because there are still outstanding questions and in terms of hunter biden i don't think he's on trial, i think he provides really critical context here and this is different from other congressional hearings we've seen because you are talking about impeaching a president and possibly throwing him out of office. therefore, we do ...

Not just boots on the ground in terms of our military but boots on the ground in terms of our intelligence and law enforcement, so on and so forth. i'm wondering why the president of mexico doesn't accept this? >> melissa: weaver they don't necessarily want to stand up to the gangs. this is what it looks like when the rule of law breaks down, you feel compassion for those people in mexico that are forced to live in this kind of situation and remind you why we uphold the rule of law here. >> jessica: i want to know the details of what this means if we were able to get militarily involved. but i...

Missiles he was ready to walk up to that microphone until he got the word two months ago they were going to get the aide anyway, so he didn't have to make an ass of himself. >> bribery quid pro quo is this for that. it's bad to request an investigation into your enemies. but i can tell you the constitution doesn't answer that question on the nose, chris. whereas once you get the quid pro quo as you just put it, the investigation for the money, hold up the money, "the new york times" report tonight saying because of the money they were going to do it, well now you have the quid pro quo bribery....

Says to you, i see what the president did here. why shouldn't i make this decision before you do, congressman? >> because the constitution doesn't say it's optional. it doesn't say it's politically feasible, go ahead. it talks about crimes and misdemeanors. and in this case, it isn't a question of whether or not the president abused his power. he did. and he must be held accountable for it. and i'll add this. the day -- the days after the mueller testimony took place is when the call took place with ukraine. this isn't a president who commits a crime once. if he isn't held accountable, he goes...