The Supreme Court has criticised a lawyer for filing a "browbeating" and "abusive" motion against court officials. The motion was brought after a case was not added to a court agenda on a date specified by the court. The court ruled that difficulties can arise with scheduling cases that are beyond the control of officials; therefore such proceedings could not be upheld if scheduled cases were not convened. Although the court stopped short of fining the lawyer, it warned that complaints must be submitted to the administrative side of the court, instead of as contempt petitio...