Continued Rile News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Hair, and the texas court of appeals had ruled 3-2 that you couldn't execute or even sustain this conviction unless that hair is the independent corroborating evidence. well, a few months ago, the innocence project and the texas observer, we were able to get a dna test on that hair that demonstrated that it did not come from claude jones, it came from the victim, and that means, legally, there was legally insufficient evidence to sustain that conviction. and what's extraordinary about it is the president didn't even know. bush didn't even know that this request had been made. and then, of cour...

That would have to be met of actual evidence, clear and convincing evidence that he's innocent, such that they would put the whole case aside, that really wasn't going to be met in this instance. but the real breakdown here in the final analysis is with the boards of pardon and parole. this is just not a case where there should have been an execution. and i want to point out, ed, and all the viewers who are out there should know, is that in texas, we've had two instances that illustrate the problems in this system. on december 7th, 2000, while george bush was waiting for the recount in florida...