Live Breaking News & Updates on Conviction Prosecutors
Stay updated with breaking news from Conviction prosecutors. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
we fought through the wilderness and threw open the doors of richmond slave jails, all to save the constitution and renew its promise of equality and freedom. we stormed the sands and scaled the cliffs of normandy. we drove tanks through the gates, we planted the stars and stripes on iwo jima and saved civilization. we marched on washington and won the right of suffrage for women. we marched over the edmund petttus build. we about built rockets to the moon. we built the largest economy, the greatest military in history, and we buried the soviet union beneath it. the american people are always there for one another. when neighbors are hurting, strangers load up their minivans and head that way. whether it was when the towers fell and people rushed across the country to search through the rubble or whether it was when the winds blew here in iowa and the floodwaters rose. so i ask you to remember who we are. if you are attempted to despair. we re americans. and there s not ....
The scene. let s listen to the prosecution and the defense during today s opening arguments. the charges all stem from the third floor. they re all from people who passed away on the third floor or injured on the third floor, but overall, it was a unspeakable, horrible thing. so what we have here is a man with a decade history of serving the community, for 32 years, and literally in 4 minutes and 15 seconds, they re claiming he became a criminal. so the prosecution there saying only it regards to the third floor. those are the victims who were injured or killed after peterson had already gotten to the area. not the first floor before he had gotten there. in order to gain a conviction prosecutors must show peterson knew the shots were coming from inside and his lack of action possibly led to more harm. chris? lindsey riser, thank you. three new candidates in the ....
Hello and welcome. a chicago court has found the actorjussie smollett guilty of lying to police after he staged an attack on himself nearly three years ago and claimed it was a hate crime. smollett, who is gay and african american paid two masked accomplices to accost him in a city street at night. our north america correspondent nomia iqbal reports. he was once a rising star, but for the last three years jussie smollett has been fighting for his reputation and career. walking into court surrounded by his family, the 39 year old has always maintained he was of them of racist and homophobic attack at a jury didn t believe him. after deliberating for nine hours they found him guilty of lying to police. after the conviction ....
He s looking for the evidence to be used to establish is there proof beyond a reasonable doubt that would result in a criminal indictment and presumably a conviction prosecutors never want to indict somebody that they think would not be convicted at trial. so i think really the question becomes what is the evidence. not speculation or anything else but what is the evidence that he is relying on to make that determination in his report to the new attorney general to say what should happen as a result of this investigation. so we have seen all the other charges, some of the guilty pleas of some of the inner circle there and then all the russians around that. all the contacts with russia and everything there s a lot of smoke there. the question is, robert mueller and his team are frankly the ....
Is that the type of pressure he would take into consideration? i don t think so. he has been given a broad mandate and i think in my experience working with him for eight or nine years before i went over to tsa, in 2010 was that he is apolitical when it comes to criminal investigations. democrat, republican, independent, it doesn t matter to him. he s looking for the evidence to be used to establish is there proof beyond a reasonable doubt that would result in a criminal indictment and presumably a conviction prosecutors never want to indict somebody that they think would not be convicted at trial. so i think really the question becomes what is the evidence. not speculation or anything else but what is the evidence that he is relying on to make that determination in his report to the new attorney general to say what should happen as a result of this investigation. so we have seen all the other ....