Live Breaking News & Updates on Courts Wouldnt Sit On This
Stay updated with breaking news from Courts wouldnt sit on this. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
They are making the document requests. and the idea the white house can refuse to produce all documents, can refuse to produce all witnesses in the entire executive branch, i just can t imagine any court will give that the time of day. although it could succeed in delaying. right. proceedings for quite a few weeks if not months. governor what would you recommend. anderson. the the question on that. i was going to say the question on that is if the full house votes for inquiry, my sense is would provide for weights to the courts. so the courts wouldn t sit on this. maybe that s a strategy that ought to be pursued. but the bottom line there are other witnesses to come forward now. we have at least two whistle-blower. it s amazing we have to try to protect their identity like they were somehow in the mafia reporting. it s crazy. and other people the former ambassador. these folks not being presented. let s try to remove you ....
Ahead and sticking to an end of october date to actually bring this to a vote in the house, which would you choose? i mean, does a vote in the house that hasn t gone through the courts, that you haven t gotten other people s testimony, is that legitimate enough for you. as expeditious as courts can be, they could not get through all the subpoenas that the white house is using as a delay tactic. so i don t think we should fall for that. i think we should proceed with the evidence we have. now if we didn t have good evidence it seems a case could be made that you just got to stop. but we have two whistle-blowers. we have a lot of evidence from those who have come forward. now they re telling us they re not letting anybody come forward. i think it s because they see we have evidence. they want to contribute to it. i think the house of representatives which has an obligation to proceed with an impeachment inquiry can t let the party on the other side of ....
Our country stands on. there are a lot of democrats who hoped to sort of try to finish this by the enof october if this does go to courts as seems likely based on men if stonewalling is the idea then dragging it through the courts is the way to go. that could take months, couldn t it? it absolutely could. again, these are tactics that are not like somebody who should be the leader of the free world. he is acting more like an authoritiarian figure who doesn t think they are subject to oversight, checked and balances designed by the constitution. this is a troubling moment. but we must persist in holding him accountable and i think the public deserves to know the truth. it will only come from a thorough investigation. is there enough evidence in your mind already out there based on the partial transcript, the president s statements, whatever other testimony may be possible or the testimony that folks in congress have already heard? is there enough for the house to actually move fo ....
His words corruption in ukraine. and cory booker, i spoke with him just before air. senator booker, what happens now, if the white house continuing to stone wall congress, what are democrats going to do about it if anything? i think we re heading towards a constitutional showdown. and some of the reasons that they re talking about make no sense to me. it seems not like stonewalling by slow walking or slow down tactics. the american public deserves the truth. and good willing the courts will be on our side. starting the impeachment inquiry give us a higher constitutional standard. but he has to answer to the checks and balances of the constitution or else he underends mines the foundation of the government that no one is above the law and oversight. his behavior right now to me is unacceptable, reckless, undermining what i believe our country dsh the foundation ....
Inside the white house and the legal team who says the president s legal team to prepared to take this balgt to the courts, that all options on the table. atlantici declining to describe this as a war in terms of the letter fired off to the house speaker today. but the source agreed this is of an escalating skirmish. we are now approaching the way life was during the bill clinton impeachment saga and watergate. remember during watergate a federal judge forced the nixon administration to::cooperate with the investigation. we are near that constitutional crisis at this point. if in fact the full house does vote on authorizing the impeachment inquiry is there any reason to think the white house would cooperate. because the letter calms on the democrats to abandon the entire thing. there is no indication the bhous will cooperate. as a matter of fact even jer administration officials held a conference to talk about the letter after it was fired off up to wloil capitol hill abone ....