second amendment. police shootings may be bad but is something we have to accept to keep crime low. until we start to connect all of this and don t just fight when it s your issue, why would anybody make the collateral damage argument that some people are disposable what we all have to do to fight on the front of that issue, we will continue to lose. really quick, cousin about to go to break. him just to say it so right because what they keep doing is asking, at what point our humanity should be turned over to the government. absolutely. stick around. right after the break.
desantis law enforcement will not support open carry they find that - carry is something they coul compromise on, as close as h could possibly get, but even gun rights advocates actuall classify and characterize th bill as woke and dilutive. so, we have both extreme sides that don t like it and realize that it s just like th political theater. but it s very dangerous. to take a firearms course, a least, it teaches you how to load it and safe operation we are doing away with that, and that is really a problem the bigger issue is it s yet another in a series of bills i proposals that come forward to our solutions for problems tha are not supposed to exist. by that, i mean, he has bragge about we re at a 50-year crime low, but yet, this is someho necessary. it follows just like elections it follows just like the ant riot bill, bragging about ho
either. well, how should it have been handled? i m not sure it should have been handled at all. if those kids weren t in any immediate harm or immediate danger, i don t see why law enforcement was called in for any reason. okay. i think we have agreement on this. . yeah really. good-bye. my work here is done. wait a minute, though. we live, lenore, in such dangerous times. ah, yes. i know because nancy grace told me so. nancy grace told me the same thing the other day. i see these child abductions constantly trumpeted in the news. do we live in such dangerous times? thank you for the softball. we live in a 50-year crime low at the moment. and sometimes people say, of course crimes are low against children, we re keeping them inside. but crime is low against, you know, car theft and burglary and murder, rape, assault, those are all down. so the fact is that crime is down and if your mom was sending you out to play anytime in the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s, she was send
danger i don t see why law enforcement was called in for any reason. okay. i think we have agreement on this. good-bye. my work here is done. wait a minute, though. we live lenore in such dangerous times. ah. i know because nancy grace told me so. nancy grace told me the same thing the other day. i see the child abductions constantly trumpeted in the news. do we live in dangerous times? thank you for the softball. we live in a 50-year crime low at the moment. of course, crime is low against children we re keeping them inside. but crime is low against, you know car theft and burglary and murder rape assault, those are all down. so the fact is that crime is down and if your mom was sending you out to play anytime in the 60s 70s 80s or 90s she was sending out in more dangerous times than today? robert do you agree with that we live in far less dangerous times than we were all raised? i don t necessarily agree with that. while there may have been
they don t think much about getting in their car. they think more about getting in an airplane even though it s probably safer to get in an airplane. i think that when you re right. there s been a big decline in violent crime. what we as a society don t know is why. and one of the questions that s going to be a big issue in new york and nationally is that one reason we probably suppressed violent crime is we have had incredibly aggressive policing policies that have harassed a huge number of hispanic men and put them in jail in records that no western society has ever reached. what we don t know as a society is can we focus more on civil liberties and as you were saying the right of those people to have their lives back while still keeping crime low. that s the real question. i see, josh, you want to keep going. we ve got to go to a break. you can tweet and continue that. would you do that? i d be honored. it is an interesting really open empirical question. coming up, at l