medicare for all yesterday and he made his case. we will not stand by and let democrats seize your healthcare, seize your choices, and seize your control over life and death healthcare decisions under medicare for all. when you pull the curtain back on medicare for all the truth is staring at you. many americans will pay more, wait longer for healthcare, and get worse care than you receive now. sandra: we will not stand by said kevin brady. he will fight. there will be democrats also. they won t be as vocal as kevin brady, not everyone in the democratic is on board for this idea. there is something about the free enterprise system and when the governments around the world, you talk about canada, the u.k. but the waiting times are extraordinarily long for simple operations and for more complex ones people who can afford it come to america to have them done. sandra: i m looking at the dow, charles. what s the dow doing?
used the example of norway, patently ridiculous. you talk about places like north korea, china, russia, people who hack us and want to hurt us and want to interfere in our election and playing right into the narrative of impeachment hearings first of all and what came out of mueller. you would welcome information from a foreign hostile power. what don junior did and other members did. you are condemning what the clintons did where they sought that information. christopher steele is not the russian government. he had his sources delineated in the report. some ended up being true and not being true. sandra: the point, this is an opportunity to point out the hypocrisy our own sean hannity walked in like a rock star this morning and he had this to say. how can you not be outraged hillary clinton literally empowered a foreign agent who
there was russian interference spelled out in the mueller report. he is saying if somebody comes along and offers me some information am i going to turn it away? the question is what s the quid pro quo for that. is the foreign government expecting something in return for once that individual is elected? it is a very slippery slope when you are saying your f.b.i. director is wrong. sandra: the response on the left has been to further calls for impeachment based on the president s answer in this new interview. obviously there is a different take on the right. what is that? first of all if you listen to what he said. he said yeah, i would go to the f.b.i. if there is something wrong. as far as his having a dispute with his own f.b.i. director, this is terrific. this is open government. this is i don t know why anybody in the media gets upset about the fact that there is this open discord in the administration. but let s think about what he has come through over the past two or three
produced a russian dossier full of russian lies that was used to infiltrate our electoral process? that was sean. not only was that information used to try to corrupt the 2016 election, but for the past two years. when we know where the information came from and we know it is all bogus, that information has been used to discredit a duly elected president. that s the more astounding part of all. sandra: we are learning and john i ll bring you in on this senator lindsey graham has apparently said the president s words were a mistake. we re trying to effort that video for you if there is video of that saying it. that would be the thoughts of lindsey graham. the attorney general has said look if an intelligent service from a foreign government comes forward to information it should be reported to the f.b.i. there are grades of this. it s unclear what violates the
in the interview, stephanopoulos pointed out the f.b.i. director christopher wray has said campaigns should reach out to the bureau if they are contacted by a foreign entity. does the president think the f.b.i. director is wrong on that? he said he would do both. i was standing just steps from him. i don t know if that clip has been played. i would be surprised if it was. lord knows we give the president the full context he deserves. if he got information and it was nefarious or ill gotten in any way and wrongdoing he would take it to the f.b.i. sandra: the president responded the f.b.i. director is wrong. right, first of all i think we were talking about james comey at the time and we all know james comey sure is wrong after being a convicted liar and leaker. he made the point he would send the information to the f.b.i. if it was in any way wrongdoing in the process. eric: if a foreign entity does contact the campaign or white house with dirt on