Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170628:05:20:00
Would, as was mentioned, be in the barrel, which meant presumably, that there would be some leaks. none of that is proof of anything. but it certainly raises a lot of suspicion and one of the benefits of having him under oath in front of a committee would be to ask him questions about that. i will say, david is absolutely right. anybody who's been around politics over the years knows that ronl ager stone who cut hi teeth as an operative for richard nixon in 1972 not only likes walking through fire but gets himself on fire. there may be utility if he's under oath in terms of answering some of t...