would be a collapse and therefore you had to act? was there a detailed debate about the reality of the nhs, and whether or not in fact an alternative position could be taken, which wouldn t inevitably lead to the collapse of the nhs? i which wouldn t inevitably lead to the collapse of the nhs?- the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically recall. the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically recall. you - the collapse of the nhs? i can t specifically recall. you are - specifically recall. you are absolutely right, there was a lot of talk about icu and monitoring of icus, what was happening, and then you had the forecast from the scientific advisers with degrees of infection and hospitalisation and as far as i can remember, or i might confuse it with the later period, you could put the curves, here is the line of nhs capacity, here is the line of nhs capacity, here is the admissions. the line of nhs capacity, here is the admi
service unease about the challenging approach of some of the special advisers approach of some of the special advisers and i had to make a judgment about the particular issue. and i decided, on balance, that at a very difficult time for the country i very difficult time for the country iwouid very difficult time for the country i would rather have a number ten where i would rather have a number ten where people challenged ideas and where where people challenged ideas and where people challenged ideas and where people brought new ideas and where where people brought new ideas and where people brought new ideas and where people felt free to say things other where people felt free to say things other tharr where people felt free to say things other than an where people felt free to say things otherthan an numberten where people felt free to say things other than an number ten where everybody other than an number ten where everybody tried to pretend that all was cont
morning on the role one of donald trump s sons has played in that very selection process . let s go to sunlen serfaty live in washington watching all of this. what are we hearing about this interior selection? not really the person, but the person who did the interviews? reporter: that s right. it seems that donald trump s son, don jr., was heavily involved in kind of getting donald trump to make this decision when he s considering potential cabinet secretaries. most notably for interior secretary. we know according to a source that donald jr. personally held and conducted some interviews for this very important cabinet post. add to that we also know, according to a source, that eric trump, his other son, sat in recently on meetings that donald trump had with mitt romney as they were going through this very public audition for potentially secretary of state. all this of course, the fact you have the involvement of two sons in these top decision-making
the ground coordinating with our air defenses, so our air force, air operations aren t hitting the rebels rather than the libyan army. it s complicated. bill: you ve been inside of the decision making meetings. have they thought about it, gamed about? i have two things: one, i don t think anyone is more resistent to military action in these situations than barack obama. no one in a military years in a million years thought in his third year into his presidency he d be launching a third war in that part of the world and no, sir this is not a war inherited from bush, this is a war he s initiating. anyone in resistance to this, it is him. point two , the case for military action, in terms of evaluating the costs, are always going to be more clear-cut, more cut and dry, than the costs that one tries to forecast for inaction, right? in the case evaluating costs for inaction are inherently speculative and inherently subjective. that s the challenge in all these situations.