Page 22 - Didnt Exist News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Investigators decided to retest the stains on the bedding from judy bruce's bedroom. dna analysis, which didn't exist in 1978, determined that they were semen. one stain matched larry bruce's dna, judy's husband. the other did not. when judy was murdered, larry claimed that judy was having an affair with a co-worker, james isaac, who died in a suspicious traffic accident days after judy's death. to see if it was isaac's dna on the bedding, investigators obtained a court order allowing them to exhume james isaac's body. >> when the dna profile from isaac was compared with the unidentified semen...

Judy bruce's bedroom. dna analysis, which didn't exist in 1978, determined that they were semen. one stain matched larry bruce's dna, judy's husband. the other did not. when judy was murdered, larry claimed that judy was having an affair with a co-worker, james isaac, who died in a suspicious traffic accident days after judy's death. to see if it was isaac's dna on the bedding, investigators obtained a court order allowing them to exhume james isaac's body. >> when the dna profile from isaac was compared with the unidentified semen on the electric blanket, it was found to be not a match. so, t...

Exact thing in terms of they and their teams decided which e-mails they would release, which e-mails they wouldn't release. substantively, it's very similar. you know, i disagree with jamila a little bit because i think it's important the idea of freedom of information and what public officials have to put on the record and what the public has access to. i do think that's a stant ifubstantive issue. there is a double standard being applied in the media and at the political level, of course. >> josh? >> the problem is jeb took the bait with hillary and spoke out about it. i don't think it's equ...

Headlines, journalists don't check anything out. editors put anything up there. rolling stone lowerrers standards to compete with them; is that right? >> i don't buy that here is the piece in the "wall street journal." the guy says here was a story made to go viral, doing journalistic due diligence on it. blunted sharp edges and sap its appeal. i think the internet is not -- the internet may be a villain in 100 other things but not. this it isn't twitter and facebook and the internet in general. this was bad journalism, period. once this suppose supposed victim, this jackie woman who says you ...

Headlines, journalists don't check anything out. editors put anything up there. rolling stone lowerrers standards to compete with them; is that right? >> i don't buy that here is the piece in the "wall street journal." the guy says here was a story made to go viral, doing journalistic due diligence on it. blunted sharp edges and sap its appeal. i think the internet is not -- the internet may be a villain in 100 other things but not. this it isn't twitter and facebook and the internet in general. this was bad journalism, period. once this suppose supposed victim, this jackie woman who says you ...