Page 2 - Directed Dhs News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Would not be a burden to taxpayers and be self-sufficient. i want to read in part what was posted saying quote, dhs acknowledges one likely outcome from the change is some individual who's have been able to imgrant under the 1999 standards will now be deemed inadmissible. there are some exceptions including active duty military members. we're expecting to hear, as i mentioned from ken ku chin -- cuccinelli and it's a packed house and we'll look forward to hearing what he has to say. >> bill: mark meredith from the white house. thank you. >> sandra: let's bring in our a-team, mary anne marsh an...

Democrats, supported the bill at the time, they had to tell the constituents they voted for it and it was all physical barrier fencing under that proposal. in 2007 the republicans offered an amendment walking back the physical barrier part of the bill because cdp was telling them they didn't want to spend money on a physical barrier, they want to technology and extra border patrol agents and other things in the conversation, the gop walked that back and gave full discretion to the secretary of homeland security how to defend the money they appropriated. >> it was what donald trump has done in ...

Let's -- >> because there's been no proof at all that there is anything. >> okay. well -- >> if you're going to assume that donald trump is in vladimir putin's pocket, i can't help you. >> i don't want you to help me, believe me. >> so why hasn't the president directed dhs and some of those other officials that are in charge of making sure this election, 2018, which is right around the corner, that they're protected, that they're actively doing things. they testified in front of congress and said there was no real directive yet. why is that? >> that is what a number of, you know, career civil ...

Dossier has credibility? >> yes, i am. i'm telling you parts of it too. >> you're telling me the pee tape has credibility. >> that is exactly what mueller is looking at, one of the things. so we'll find out. why are we arguing about this when mueller is going to come out with the answer? but you can't sit there and say, russia has nothing on him when all of this series of facts, which makes many people believe that -- >> i'm saying russia has nothing on him, and if they do -- >> all right. let's -- >> because there's been no proof at all that there is anything. >> okay. well -- >> if you're go...