that aside, it s as emphatic anm definitive as conservatives hoped and progressives feared. it s the way that the 14th amendment was color blind, jackson and others, nonsense., look at what the 14th amendment achieved. brown versust board of educati, likewise. nonsense says the dissent. it was race sensitive. the 14th amendment must be race sensitive. then there s this world s worl viewpoint, there they are like t ships passing in the night. one side says, look at the worlt today and whathe needs to be do. the conservatives, the law of the land, say ending discrimination means ending all discrimination, period, paragraph, end of story. yes, there will be a tiny little wormhole that people will push h on. the basic thrust of what the majority has done it s as emphatic as the dobbs opinion last year is to really have a revolution in the meaning of thl constitution and socially permissible ends as a result. laura, for a long time, quotas have been not permitted. sinc
emphatic as the dobbs opinion last year is to really have a revolution in the meaning of thl constitution and socially permissible ends as a result. laura, for a long time, quotas have been not permitted. since 1978 and a decision in 2003, justice o connor was an important voice on that, using race as a factor was considered constitutional because of all of the years of discrimination. now they are saying that there s has to be an end point to this, the way they did in 2013 with t voting rights. everything is going to be fixed at some point in history, which does tend to ignore legacy admissions policies. those have not been challenged.d that i know of. alumni children, grandchildren,l nieces, nephews get preferences, which builds in preferences for