Page 3 - Dobbs Vs News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Investigators in negotiating the terms, turning over documents, but the pace had the committee weighing more aggressive measures against him. is his cooperation a sign that enforcing these subpoenas with threats of contempt is actually working? >> i think it does and that's what we've heard from this committee all along. they've said in the wake of steve bannon's indictment the doj decided to prosecute the criminal contempt case against him earlier this month, that they thought it had achieved its goal of essentially scaring some of these witnesses into cooperating but meadows has been more i ...

Just -- they were ridiculous. i could not save up enough money if i tried. i was essentially forced to carry that pregnancy to term, even though i didn't want to. being put into poverty was one of my fears and that definitely happened. our lights were off because i needed to redistribute money within the household and make sure the rent is paid so we're not evicted. >> hi, everyone, it's 5:00 in new york, and i'm jason johnson in for nicole wallace. the less spoken about consequences of being denied an abortion, the physical, mental, and financial weight of it. accounts like you just heard fro...

Incredibly concerned about where the supreme court will go in taking up this case around dobbs vs. jackson women's health, and the stories that we heard were unbelievable. they were stories of providers who could no longer provide care, stories of patients who had to seek access to abortion under incredibly challenging circumstances. stories of young people who had, you know, tried to express their constitutional right and having to go to extreme lengths in order to be able to access abortion. and i think what's critical right here is that lawmakers and courts listened to the stories that were...

Vigilante mechanism to enforce its law so there's no one in state government for us to enjoin from enforcing the law and that's a disingenuous sort of a legal analysis. but it's correct, i think, that that means that roe is functionally dead, as cecile says, in texas. there are other states that would like to follow that approach and likely will and of course they may not need to depending on what the supreme court does when dobbs vs. jackson women's health center is decided this term. that could end abortion rights nationwide or at least in states that take advantage of that ruling and no lon...

>> one of the important things to keep in mind about roe v. wade is that it has been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years. i understand the importance of the issue. >> roe v. wade decided in 1973. the president of the united states supreme court, it has been reaffirmed. the reliance interest considerations are important there. >> i can't express views on cases or precommit to approaching a case any particular way. >> there was a lot of gray there. right? but now we know where they stand when it comes to this texas law. can we now assume how they would vote if roe v. wade were challenge...