Page 18 - Doesnt Apply News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

People to decide. he is inviting foreign senior level. interference,s allowing foreig i've got to think there are people who worked on this for governments to decide that for us. months, professionally, mr. e orgoldman, it's been confd carefully, seriously who see mr. that president trump's campaign barr come out and mr. durham who actively sought russia's interferencely in our 2016 until today is. thought to hava good reputation. elections, correct? mr. durham out of the blue >> what special counsel mueller without offering any receipts, said is that president trump did we don't agree with so...

I am going to ask our one republican witness whether he thinks the things in the report rise to high crimes and misdemeanors or and impeachable offense and his answer to that question if you read anything he wrote is going to be no. nothing here is high crimes and misdemeanors. the standard adam schiff is trying to use for bribery doesn't apply in this circumstance. it is not bribery in the sense adam schiff is saying it is bribery and this is been going on for two years and from the day i was warning to congress members of my own class were calling for his impeachment on day one. it started w...

House judiciary, people will learn and understand this is a political process. it's not a criminal one. but it's meant to lead the dictator in the oval office like donald trump. >> real quick, what is the democrat's best legal argument, katie? sorry. i wanted to follow up on that, what's for the democrats their best legal argument? >> their best legal argument is that the united states constitution allows for impeachment for treason, which doesn't apply here and bribery and high crimes and misdemeanor, the abuse of power which was something brought effectively during the nixon investigation an...

We know what treason is, doesn't apply in this case, and we know the technical definition of bribery. also there's high crimes and misdemeanors. the house judiciary committee will gets a visit to law school. it's going to get an education in terms of what the constitution meant when it said high crimes and misdemeanors and subsequent to that is the opportunity to hear from witnesses, but chairman nadler, being the majority ranking member, he is the person who will control the witnesses, the subpoenaing of documents. republicans can ask for it, kendis, but unlike during a criminal trial, you ha...

Statement saying in mcgahn, meaning the ruling, the house judiciary committee emphasized to the district court that the information it sought from mr. mcgahn, quote, did not involve the sensitive topics of national security or foreign affairs. therefore, any passing references in the mcgahn decision instead of court's opinion to presidential communications concerning national security matters are not authoritative on the validity of testimonial immunity for close white house advisers. that's legal speak for that doesn't apply to us. but judge jackson said her ruling applies to all claims of te...