Page 20 - Doesnt Apply News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Today, the erg, the hardline team who does not support theresa may some of them are in government, but a tweet to say that the erg recommends mps vote for this deal. this is a big development. they are not a homogeneous group. but if some come on board, they'll be for boris johnson. >> he has opposition? >> this takes into account other mps or abstaining votes. >> is there any feeling similarly to what we had that with the voting, because let's just get brexit done? let's get brexit done, rather than some deeply held belief one way or the other? that doesn't apply to the erg but the labor. >> ...

Leading up to this testimony today between the white house lawyers and fiona hill's lawyers about what exactly she could say. the white house didn't go as far as to exert executive privilege and say, we don't think she can testify at all. that had been a big question. but they did lay out several areas where they said, we think this is covered by executive privilege, communications with the president, diplomatic conversations. we think she should not be able to talk about these things. fiona hill's lawyers pushing back and saying, look, there is an implication here that there is wrongdoing by ...

And say, we don't think she can testify at all. that had been a big question. but they did lay out several areas where they said, we think this is covered by executive privilege, communications with the president, diplomat conversations. we think she should not be able to talk about these things. fiona hill's lawyers pushing back and saying, look, there is an implication here that there is wrongdoing by the government and executive privilege doesn't apply in that instance. and basically where things ended up as they headed into this very lengthy testimony today was with the white house lawyers...

Blows a whistle on something and they say it's government money they get a portion of that money which doesn't apply here but the rules are you have to have information that other people have to be a whistle blower. if there is another person that had firsthand knowledge that would have more credibility than the first one. >> neil: where is this going? >> i'm not sure the second whistle blower makes a difference given the fact we have a transcript of this call and the voters who are looking at this and saying we are going to stick with the president even though they might not be happy with wha...

Only one stating back to the 1940s has there ever been a penalty of $250,000 that high reached. that is the jurisdictional limit that we were able to levy for a discriminatory act. in fact in most situations, whether or not there's even a decision to levy a penalty is made by looking at the circumstances of each individual case, including, of course, the size of the entity, the circumstances underlying, sophistication. in many instances fines are not even levied. >> housing and public accommodation, other areas that would be covered. what's not covered so we're providing good information and p...