Page 3 - Doesnt Attack News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Against these people, would you then agree with the attack? >> no, i think i would take assad out. i would do a osama bin laden, let's take out bashar al assad, instead of killing a bunch of people, really not sure who else we kill in the meantime, we may kill people that are friendly to us, syrian military. here is another thing, think about this one second. >> for the record here, you would not go in and take out, try to degrade. >> no. here is the other thing, once we go in and do this, bob, i think we're going to, when john boehner comes out and says i am for this, he will probably get the...

Safer, less safe, i can make it crystal clear to you, israel will be less safe unless the united states takes this action. iran and hezbollah are two of the three biggest allies of assad. and iran and hezbollah are the two single biggest enemies of israel. if iran and hezbollah are advantaged by the united states not curbing assad's use of chemical weapons, there is a much greater likelihood that at some point down the road hezbollah, who has been one of the principal reasons for change in the situation on the ground, will have access to these weapons of mass destruction, and israel will for c...

>> i also emphasize, if it is the wrong resolution, it can do just as much damage in my view. thank you. >> senator udall? >> thank you very much. i thank all of the witnesses for their testimony and for their service here today and i also want to thank chairman menendez for the way he has conducted this hearing. like everyone here, i deplore what bashar al assad has done to his people by attacking them with chemical weapons. >> you are listening to senator john mccain and a hearing that's continuing about the resolution and president obama's plan to attack, well, send missiles into helpfully ...

Did that change your mind. no. why is it just us, bob? are the french, brits, germans against the geneva convention or whatever the red line originally signed that said -- are they against that? are they okay with human rights atrocities? >> they're not. >> why aren't they joining us. if it is so bad and they're so sure, why aren't they with us? >> besides the british and maybe the french, they don't have military capability to do what we need to do to degrade the forces, united states is the only one that does, one. two, the saudis have, you can argue oil, the saudis, kuwaitis who believe ira...

The attack have been engineered to look like assad because of obama's red line comment. number two, is there a way to punish syria strongly while not assisting people who hate us. that's the key. or can we hit them both? i mean, we keep telling the people relax, it is not a war, it is not a bombing, it is not an attack, it is an action. i would like it to be all three if we're going to -- if it means we win. >> the free syrian army does like us, there's a difference here. the distinction ought to be kept -- >> how about the syrian army? >> what about the syrian army? how do they feel about us?...