Doesnt Comey News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

would not charge her based on that.. no one. >> sean: but if we're going to have equal justice under the law, doesn't comey -- doesn't we have a case of obstruction for himm or him and peter strzok, if they break the entire investigation, theth special investigation, and they hid the evidence? >> that is why congress is calling them in. i think strzok is in a tremendous amount of trouble. i think comey is going to be in trouble. in his mind, the best defense is a good offense, and that is what he has been trying to do but failing at it. yes, i think huma abedin has big problems, as well, a...

Charge her based on that. no one. >> but if we go -- if we're gonna have equal justice under the law, doesn't comey now -- don't we have a case of obstruction, pam, for him and peter strzok if they rigged the entire investigation, the special investigation and they hid the evidence? >> and that's why congress is calling them in. i think strzok is in tremendous amount of trouble. i think comey is going to be in trouble. i think in his mind the best defense is a good offense and that's what he is trying to do but failing at it. i think huma abedin has big problems as well as she should. >> sean:...

He's either wants to clear his name, of course, trump fired him some republicans in congress agreed with that, and then we learned trump called comey a nut job, or he's got a bombshell about bombshell about president trump and the conversations those two had in private. it could be both of those things, but i just firmly believe he is going in front of congress for a specific reason next week. >> doesn't comey usually have a bombshell when he sits there? >> he was really good at that, right, in 2007, i think it was, when he testified before congress last time. he has -- he's very good at stage...

Something smart. certainly. gregg: isn't that what the president then did. >> perhaps. that's why calling it a criminal is not doing it good. no one will prosecute the president in the courtroom. will it lead to further investigation, impeachment proceedings. parsing the statutory language here is not that useful. gregg: when nixon fired archibald cox that was not in and of itself obstruction. it was considered that he had a constitutional authority to do it. now, doug, doesn't comey himself have a legal poverty if he thought the president was attempting to instruct him his required by law to ...