Doesnt Drag News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Im going to thank frank, elise, carol and matt. My colleague chuck todds going to pick up our coverage of the president s Press Conference. The beef and all of the different things, pork, very big on pork. But if you look and you see, i actually think they put out a statement. Theyre starting to buy very heavily our ag again. They want to make a deal. The question is do we want to make a deal . If smc doesnt pass through congress, is that the end of nafta . I dont want to answer that question but you know how i feel about nafta. I think nafta is the worst trade deal ever made. I also think the...

Than deal with the consequences of reshape the geopolitical landscape. >> i'm not an expert but i couldn't agree more in that respect. massive landward incursion on the european continent is, you know, bad. with horrible historical ant seedants. what's the diplomatic off ramp? look, russia's a nuclear power. russia is not and nato is not going to send ground troops to eastern ukraine to fight russian soldiers. blinken is in the region seeking a diplomatic off ramp. what is the off ramp? >> it's not that easy to take pieces off the table right now. i think, frankly, it's one of the places where...

-- that. horrible historical antecedents. i guess the question is, what's the? -- russia is a nuclear power, the u.s. is not, and nato is not going to send ground troops into the eastern ukraine to fight russian soldiers. blinken is in the region seeking a diplomatic offering. what is the off ramp? >> it's not that easy to take pieces off of their table, right now. frankly, it's one of the places where this administration fell short. they thought that maybe this was diplomatic coercion. they thought the scale of this might be smaller, more limited, or something that doesn't drag the u.s. into ...

The democratic led house, but there are a lot of, again, when they push -- when this gets pushed to the senate, the president and republicans feel they are on a little bit more favorable terrain here. obviously -- >> favorable but not factual terrain sadly. on the issue of mcgahn, a federal judge making a decision today really to don mcgahn's testimony before the house. this is not directly related to the impeachment inquiry, but relevant because it challenges the question of absolute immunity from the white house. say the judge rules in favor of the house here, what difference does that make ...

You hoped that they would have a deliberate process. but i imagine you also hope it doesn't drag, too. what is your ideal timeline here? i mean, this is unusual. i mean, part of me wishes we could get the founders up here and say, okay, and say, okay, would you -- 15 months before the election, do you use the impeachment process, right? this is not an easy call, is it not? >> that's right, chuck. here's what i have often said about the question of removal through impeachment over the last year or two. i serve in the senate. so unlike virtually any other trial we could imagine, we actually know...