Doesnt Know Libya News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Moment. as i said, as she testified, one piece of information was someone claiming that this was a terrorist attack connected to al qaeda that was retracted. but this theory that goes to the question of whether the public was told the truth never made sense because the public statements were true. >> john -- >> ben -- >> you have hillary clinton, let's be clear. if you're hillary clinton, you sat there and had a blunt conversation with the president of libya, you had a blunt conversation people in charge in egypt and you said in those e-mails to them, this was not an attack based on a protest....

That i guess is not that surprising. what we're trying to do is get her to give us the information so we can get to the truth for the american taxpayer, the american people and probably most importantly, for the families of the four individuals who died that day. >> this is always the part that confuses me. the narrative that you and many republicans have stuck to is what happened afterwards in terms of was it a video, was it a terror attack? it's the spin afterwards. it's what susan rice said that is so upsetting. but what about how does that affect before, the cause of this? and how to bette...

After that on the 12th or 13th, they retracted their claim of responsibility. >> congressman, do you accept her explanation? >> no, because that's not all she said to the egyptian prime minister. she said to the egyptian prime minister, we know, not i think, we know it was not the film. it was a planned attack, not a protest. that is a straightforward language as you can get. in private she was straightforward. she was forthcoming. publicly it was the video inspired protest narrative. it was a completely different narrative she could tell the american people. she could tell her family the trut...

What's the up shot? who goes to jail for being politically expedient. >> it's not that i'm right. that's what the facts show. if the facts show that relevantive to to what they tried to communicate publicly versus what they were saying privately, let's go to the situation today. we know secretary clinton and her legal team got to decide which e-mails belonged to the taxpayer and which ones were private. the fbi has that server. let's suppose the fbi finds deleted e-mails or e-mails that were wiped or whatever and they discover there's information work related and specifically even related to l...

Is that a fair line of questioning? >> it's a fair question. the answer is obvious and doesn't yield the dynamite they were hoping for. she has 70,000 employees, 270 missions around the world. almost everything is supposed to be vetted, including important security information at a level well below her. her political friend whose e-mails we can see, much of it is online, he's playing amateur spy, playing amateur diplomat, he's playing amateur political consultant and the stuff in some ways is somewhat laughable. the notion she was relying on this for advice, i don't think is born out by her re...