Stay updated with breaking news from Drew on call. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Inside of the jury room wouldn t be shared with the public at large and unlike many juries i ve interviewed, they are sticking together and they are not out there looking for fame as some are suggesting they are not doing a lot of interviews this is one of two, a local interview they are doing, and they could have done more if they wanted fame and they want everybody to know how serious they took this and the decision process that went into the decision. as you just heard, aaron hernandez s action and demeanor seen on the video were a big factor for the jurors. and joining us dr. drew on call and sunny hostin. and you heard them talk about how they immediately zeroed in on the fact that aaron hernandez seemed to indicate he had a sense of what time odin lloyd was killed ant the juror and the juror raised the question ....
Diagnosis of sigh coatis. was he having hallucinations? was he imagining things that weren t there? that s sort of what that doctor that medical report was alluding to. we don t know for sure. and some of the medications he was taking some of the side effects of that medication can be blurred vision. so there s a lot of moving pieces. but psychosomatic means the mind is making up an illness that does not exist. thanks so much. thank you. what happened here raises all questions about the system for screening pilots around the world and right here at home. dr. drew pinsky is joining us. the host of dr. drew on call. also joining us the faa s person in charge of medical certification and the afeivation and attorney. the screening process for ....
State. was he having hallucinations of some sort was he imagining things that were not there. that s sort of what that doctor that medical report was sort of alluding to here. again, we don t know for sure. we also know some of the medications he was taking, some of the side effects of the medications can be blurred vision. there s a lot of moving pieces here. but when it comes to psychosomatic, it basically means the mind is making up an illness or imagining an illness that does not exist, wolf. dr. sanjay gupta, as usual, thanks very much. you got it wolf. thank you. more perspective, because what happened to this individual raises all kinds of questions for screening pilots and prospective pilots around the world especially right here at home. dr. drew pin ski is joining us host of dr. drew on call on hln. and the former person in charge of medical certification, dr. silverman. and the aviation attorney and pilot justin green. dr. silverman, one of the struggles with the scree ....
So much. thank you. so having heard all of that, i want to bring in our panel. mark geragos and danny cevallos and host of dr. drew on call. one of the problems was the alcohol abuse and something the jury picked up on. yeah, i m actually fascinated. the jury in this case seems to have hit on all the issues. they would have been read an instruction that was essentially this. voluntary intoxication is not a defense to any crime in texas. so every shred of evidence that was evidence of intoxication or drug use negated that insanity defense. that s why the prosecution pushed so hard to get that in and the defense was left in an awkward position of trying to separate the two, saying, yes, he used drugs but that was separate and distinct from his mental disease that he labored under. which is interesting because i m sure as dr. drew will tell us, it s almost impossible to separate in the case of a dual diagnosis a mental illness with a drug addiction or abuse. ....
so having heard all of that i want to bring in our panel. mark geragos and danny cevallos and host of dr. drew on call. one of the problems was the alcohol abuse and something the jury picked up on. yeah i m actually fascinated. the jury in this case seems to have hit on all the issues. they would have been read an instruction that was essentially this. voluntary intoxication is not a defense to any crime in texas. so every shred of evidence that was evidence of intoxication or drug use negated that insanity defense. that s why the prosecution pushed so hard to get that in and the defense was left in an awkward position of trying to separate the two, saying yes, he used drugs but that was separate and distinct from his mental disease that he labored under. which is interesting because i m sure as dr. drew will tell us, it s almost impossible to ....