Page 12 - Editing Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

They destroyed her virtue and ruined her reputation. >> unnamed sources saying that brett kavanaugh exposed himself at a party. what was left out is the alleged victim saying that she does not remember such incident. editor's cut that crucial information from their piece. >> there was zero intent to mislead anybody. >> somewhere in the editing process, those words -- >> it was editing done in a haste of the editing process of coming you know -- >> she admits that she wrote it. still, such 2020 candidates as kamala harris continue to demand impeachment. >> it so yes. i call for impeachment. i b...

Removed the other reference to the fact that she didn't remember. it was sort of editing done in a haste. >> greg: so this humongous detail disappeared in the haste of the editing process. that's like saying that we left out the fact that the titanic sank. this was no error. this was a business decision. when the victim renounced her own victimhood, they renounced it. they suggested substance abuse. how do they still have jobs? and what about her allies who threatened to sue one witness? she didn't back up her story. that's pretty huge too. somehow that got ignored too. but this is the media. ...

Coauthor. >> all we can talk about here is that in our book we do have that. it was in the original version. in the editing process i think there was some debate about naming her. in the course of that reporting, i think the judgment was made to omit her name, and that sentence also included the fact that she didn't remember it. >> melissa: so they are blaming an editor. that an editor took it out. but they went on to say that the real meat of the book -- that's not of an early point. the point is they want to relitigate what went on with ms. ramirez. but "the wall street journal" points out t...

Times" wrote this article based on that book. robin and then kate kelly. here is robin speaking about what was taken out of her original article, she says. listen. >> we had her name. and, you know, the "times" doesn't usually include the name of the victim. >> right. >> so i think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was better to remove it. in removing her name they removed the other reference tout fact that she didn't remember. i think it was an editing done in the haste in the editing process. >> were you involved in the decision to amend this and do the correction, the addition onl...

But the problem for democrats here is the victim says look, i don't remember it happened. this is not the victim saying it happened and to me, having my masters in broadcast journalism, it actually slowly make my skin crawl that "the new york times" or any other outlet that calls themselves a journalist would not have all the facts that it would go by the editor before it put it out there. >> now are they blaming the editing process for leaving out the key fact. >> anybody who knows how the process works knows that the reporters would have to get final signoff, you get the edits back from your...