little boy. a lot of people are asking questions about why they won t just let him go. an interesting piece says what i think a lot of people are wondering, the only reason that they would refuse to let them go is because they are terrified that he really might be successfully treated. if they are wrong on a question of life and death, it is being scrutinized internationally. no one would ever trust an nhs end-of-life assessment again. letting him go would require the british health care and judicial systems through the one thing bureaucracies bristles are doing, knowing how it undermines their institutional authorities, they would have to admit they were wrong. they can t do it, to preserve the public s trust, the child must starve. pretty harsh. it s awful. i would say it s deserved, as you mentioned, the the doctorst the british hospital have not been able to diagnose his problem. they are saying he certainly doomed but they don t understand what is happened. as you have pointed