stated, the framer s plan contemplates that the president s law enforcement powers extend to all matters including those in which he had a personal stake, end quote. please explain what you base this conclusion on. yes. here the department of justice right here. and within the department of justice enforcement decisions are being made. the president s over here. and i think of it as there are two categories of potential communications. one would be on a case that the president wants to communicate about that he has no personal interest in, no political interest in. let s say the president s concerned about chinese stealing trade secrets and saying i want you to go after this company that s being that may be stealing trade secrets. that s perfectly appropriate for him to do. to communicate that.
days, one, significantly improving our appeals process to address errors in enforcement decisions and we know we have to take more of the burden off the shoulders of victims of harassment and threats, we must do better and we will do better. do you think they re doing enough? the fact that there s really not a way to detect threats already i mean, like you said in the intro, 240-plus threats. things like you re next, hug your loved ones and your family, tweeting photos of one s family. the fact this couldn t be caught beforehand i think is a little disturbing. andrew kaczynski, thank you for going through this. i can t imagine what you guys at
i want to start by making something very clear, we don t consider political viewpoints, perspectives or party affiliation in any of our policies or enforcement decisions, period. impartiality is our guiding principle. david: twitter ceo jack dorsey defending himself of political bias, executives. grilled amid growing debate over whether conservative viewpoints are suppressed on social media forms and search functions. the justice department announced on wednesday that jeff sessions will meet with state attorneys general later this month to discuss concerns that tech companies may be, quote, intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas on their platforms, well, james, the market didn t think much of mr. dorsey s comments because twitter was way down on the day that he testified. yeah, and i m not sure any of us should think too much of
i want to start by making something very clear, we don t consider political viewpoints, perspectives or party affiliation in any of our policies or enforcement decisions, period. impartiality is our guiding principle. david: twitter ceo jack dorsey defending himself of political bias, executives. grilled amid growing debate over whether conservative viewpoints are suppressed on social media forms and search functions. the justice department announced on wednesday that jeff sessions will meet with state attorneys general later this month to discuss concerns that tech companies may be, quote, intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas on their platforms, well, james, the market didn t think much of mr. dorsey s comments because twitter was way down on the day that he testified. yeah, and i m not sure any of
twitter s practices. we don t consider political viewpoints, perspectives or party affiliation in any of our policies or enforcement decisions. the allegation that we make, the republicans, is that you are discriminatory against us, against the republicans. we agree that the result was not impartial, and that is why we corrected and we fixed it. so you do agree that there were more republicans than democrats? i didn t say that, but i do but you can t have it both ways, sir. laura: jack seemed really bored with a whole big hearing. joining me now as health majority leader kevin mccarthy. the reason he showed up into town, but there s no problem here. it s just an algorithm, they know they say there s no problem. a couple days before the hearing they admitted there was some problems. they did agree that the