Page 6 - Fa Sequester News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Fa sequester. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Fa Sequester Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130221:23:53:00

When i say to them there is no reason they should be furloughed. there is no reason they should lose their job or be laid off. this is a problem that congress can solve. you know, the automatic spending cuts that were put in place in 2011 were designed to get congress actually to avoid them by coming together with more sensible approaches to deficit reduction. bret: president obama talking to local affiliate about the sequester and eric cantor said house republicans acted and time for the president to send democrats to join us and get off the campaign trail and fete to work and show us what spending reductions you prefer and let s find some common ground. here we go again. you heard interviews in this show earlier tried to press for answers. charles, your reaction and one day closer? the president says it ....

Spending Cuts , The Automatic , Fa Sequester , House Republicans , President Obama , White House , Deficit Reduction , Eric Cantor , Campaign Trail , Spending Reductions , Here We Go Again , Charles Krauthammer ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130221:23:49:00

Had on obamacare. deeply unpopular. the imple mation will be a disaster. you do not want to be seen as a party, or the individual politicians as abetting what is going to be a certain policy disaster coming up shortly. bret: next up, another day closer to sequester. [ male announcer ] how do you measure happiness? by the armful? by the barrelful? e carful? how about.by the bowlful? ....

Obama Care , Imple Mation , Policy Disaster , Fa Sequester ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130221:23:56:00

Who sued because they had been laid off in an effort to save the government money. it s almost perfect because you have ill-conceived super committee from the beginning i thought was doomed to fail. bad idea from the beginning. now we have a sequester which was a bad idea from the beginning. it would be almost the perfect poetic ending. good idea. this is the only chance of having any cuts of this administration between today and january 2017. does it happen? yes. it happens and then it is pulled back in part. bret: that is it for the panel. but stay tupeed for recap of vice president s biden facebook q&a. hey, our salads. [ bop ] [ bop ] [ bop ] you can do that all you want, i don t like v8 juice. ....

Ill Conceived Super Committee , Fa Sequester , Vice President , Biden Facebook , January 2017 , Q A , V8 Juice ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130221:23:09:00

Chamber. why didn t they vote on it? you will see a vote coming up on you will see something to help delay it over the next year. you have already seen the elements of a short-term balanced plan. i want to get to a question about transfer authority. why not call for transfer sequester to move the mup around and reach $85 billion without effecting personnel and having painful decisions to affect the personnel negatively? nine that tells you there are easy off ramp here is not straightforward. if this sequester goes in effect in any form, $85 billion in cuts over seven pop months, 10-12% cut to defense. it s estimated that it would cost $750,000 jobs 750,000 ....

Didn T , Transfer Authority , Transfer Sequester , 85 Billion , 5 Billion , Fa Sequester , Defense Of Marriage Act ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20121231:01:08:00

Negative affect on anybody, i confirmed this talking to one of wealthiest men of boston, i asked if we were to raise taxes by that amount on him would he know it if his accountant didn t make a point of telling him. he said of course not. but in any case the 400 is an effort to have a compromise. and then maybe you bring in some other elements. but let me ask you about other things being talked about here. politico describes talks as hanging by a thread and say now that this change, potentially the social security taken off the table by republicans, the problem is over sort of turning off the sequester, those tens of billions of dollars in spending cuts. yes. democrats, we are told, tell me if i m right, they want to use some revenue from increased taxes to postpone those cuts. and republicans object to that. is that your understanding where things stand? no, not partially true. here s the big problem. the position of most republicans ....

Big Sticking Point , Congressional Republicans , Fa Sequester , Spending Cuts , Social Security , Bush Tax Cuts ,