Page 46 - Fair Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> very well could. there are potential ways that the court can resolve this that sidesteps some of the challenging and thorny issues but nonetheless allows the trump administration to go forward with that question. and so i guess all i would just say is that if folks are concerned about the political implications, they shouldn't assume that the courts will bail them out. they have to work with their representatives to fight on those issues. >> people looking for bailouts left and right. ultimately, the votes have consequences. lauren fox, renato mariotti. the house committee has been debating...

Tactic, but in and of itself, a court is not going to have a problem with it. i think the question is going to be in the end, what are they asserting executive privilege over, and that is really the question. are they going to continue asserting it overall or are they going to say there's a small subset of documents and have some justification as to why those are privileged? >> mark preston is here, too, i think, as well. mark, help us understand why -- like does this matter after the supreme court makes its decision? the census bureau is ready either way, right? they've got two versions that ...

And willing to work with. >> i hear that. >> the court is the high -- that's the end of the road, right? >> yeah. >> once the supreme court weighs in, that's it. in some ways people will say this is a political issue that democrats are trying to stir up. it's not so much that. you have to take yourself away from this issue alone and look at this as two different issues. one issue is this. one issue is whether the administration will comply with any oversight from congress. >> but the court has clearly become a political body on some of these issues, divided down the line on issues, whether it'...

>> that's just not true. >> give me example of a prior president. >> obama used executive privilege. the clintons. >> on every congressional subpoena? >> not on every -- and that's just not the case here. >> what's the difference? >> you're not representing the facts accurately. the bottom line is we'll have this dispute between congress and the white house. it's a longstanding dispute. at end of the day, the people who lose are the american people. we're focused on investigation. if that's the mission of this new majority in the house of representatives to complete, i guess that's what they'r...

Members of the trump campaign and russia during the campaign, don junior has been caught, and the trump team, in a lie on that meeting. of course, they claimed it was about adoptions. it's not. don junior knew in advance they would be damaging information on hillary clinton. that's why he took the meeting. the issue now is, was it just one communication about that? or it seems that rick gates and others have testified there was a fair amount of talk about this, that more people knew about that and knew exactly what they were doing as they come in here. does that still leave open the issue of j...