Stay updated with breaking news from Favor industries. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Tweet us cnbc fast money. Lets start with a strong start to the week for the markets. In fact, recordbreaking close for the nasdaq tech leading the way it has done so often guy, your take on todays rally. If we snapshot today, guy, Half Way Point of the year, the dow is down 8 or so the nasdaq 100, up 21 , almost a 30 differential will that be repeated in the second half of the year . Well, first of all, its great to be with you you know, im a huge fan of yours. Ive mentioned that number of times. So. Thanks for hanging out with us this evening. Thanks for having me, guys. Im hard pressed to believe that you can come anywhere close to having that same kind of out performance in the second half but i have to say, i didnt think it would happen in the first half of the year so who am i to sort of speculate on that. What i will say in terms of the s p 500 with its move basically within a whisper of its alltime high if you assume 130 w ....
Doctrine or keep it. Custice roberts well hear argument first this morning in case 221219, relentless versus the department commerce. Mr. Martinez. Or aument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicialss and undermined statutory interpretation. It should be overror three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Article iii emwe judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their best and iepdent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates ieretive authority from courts to agenciesanit forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that aued for political or policy reasons. In so, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and enures agency overreach. And by removing key checks o executive power, it threatens ind ....
Chief Justice Roberts well hear argument first this mni in case 221219, relentless versus the dept of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please tht for too long, chevron has distorted the dial process and undermined statutory interpretation. It should orruled for three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Articliiempowers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to int federal statutes using their be a independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reall Interpretive Authority from courts to es, and it forces courts to adopt inferior Agency Construction are issued for political or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron blocks judges from ....
Your argument case 221219, leless versus the department of commerce. Marston martin as. Mister chief justice, may it please the court. For too long chevron has distorted the judicial process and undermined stato inrpretation. It should be overruled for three reasons, first, cheon violates the constitution. Article 3 a pers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their stnd independent judgment. Chevron undermines that du. It reallocate interpreti authorities from courts to agencies and forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that are issued for political or policy reasons. In doingso, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of congress. It mandates judicial biaan encourages agency overreach. By removing key checks on ecutive power it threatens individual liberty. Chevron also violates the apa, the most straightforward reading of section 706 requires review of legal questions. Congre put constitutional and statutory ....
Doctrine or keep it. Chief Justice Roberts well hear argument first this morning in case 221219, relentless versus the department of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicial process and undermined statutory interpretation. It should be overruled for three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Article iii empowers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their best and independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates Interpretive Authority from courts to agencies, and it forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that are issued for political or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron bl ....