Page 26 - Fawning News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

It's not about a lie detector. it's about the "new york times" claiming this is a highly placed individual where high-level people in the white house agree with with the president is doing. if they disagree, they do it in the a patriotic way. judge jeanine: there is always going to be back and forth. that's the way you run anything. but the significant part of it to me is there is all this fawning over john mccain. wonderful war hero. why is that so part a part of this? what does it tell you? but let's keep going. i want to talk about fisa. you were the head of government oversight. do you thi...

Judges who would want the job. and to add to that, kavanaugh, chuck, was really fawning over the president when he accepted the nomination. let's play that sound bite. >> throughout this process, i have witnessed firsthand your appreciation for the vital role of the american judiciary. no president has ever consulted more widely or talked with more people for more backgrounds to seek input about a supreme court nomination. mr. president, i am grateful to you and i am humbled by your confidence in me. >> chuck, he said throughout this process, i have witnessed first hand your appreciation for t...

This and it is unsettling. the fact the president is an unindicted co-conspirator is highly unsettling. i still come back to my original point. that justices of the supreme court appointed for life often and early establish their independence from whoever appointed they will. precedent matters a lot here. and remember the earlier decisions that i talked about where justices appointed by the very president under fire, sided against anymore both cases. so yeah. fawning, absolutely. unsettling, you bet. i still have a lot of faith in the rule of law. >> what do you think? >> well, yes. precedent ...

Judges who would want the job. and to add to that, kavanagh, chuck, was really fawning over the president when he accepted the nomination. let's play that sound bite. >> throughout this process, i have witnessed firsthand your appreciation for the vital role of the american judiciary. no president has ever consulted more widely or talked with more people for more backgrounds to seek input about a supreme court nomination. mr. president, i am grateful to you and i'm humbled by your confidence in me. thank you. >> chuck, he said throughout this process i have witnessed firsthand your appreciatio...

My view, is an unindicted coconspirator is highly unsettling. i still sort of come back to my original point, which is is that justices of the supreme court appointed for life often and early establish their independence from whoever appointed them. precedent matters a lot here. and remember those earlier decisions that i talked about where justices appointed by the very president under fire sided against him in both cases. so yeah, fawning absolutely. unsettling, you bet. but i still have a lot of faith in the rule of law. >> charlie, what do you think? >> well, yes, precedent matters, but so...