Feesa Warrant News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> right. so it does appear as though obviously there are connections here. there are two separate investigations. one is a previous investigation related to mr. manafort's contacts and work on behalf of the ukrainian government. that warrant was concluded for lack of evidence after a period of time. then there's some gap and then the warrant was restarted in relation to investigation between the trump campaign and contacts with russian officials. so it does sound like there are two investigations, but obviously paul manafort's connections to either russian officials or ukrainian officials sym...

That investigation centered on work done by a group of washington consulting firms for ukraine's former ruling party. our sources say that surveillance was discontinued at some point last year for lack of evidence, according to one of the sources, and then the fbi restarted the surveillance after obtaining a new fisa warrant that extended at least into early this year, now, the second warrant, don, was part of the fbi's efforts to investigate ties between trump campaign associates and suspected russian operatives. it's unclear when that new warrant started, but we have learned that as part of ...

If there was, what does that mean? in addition to president trump, who else was paul manafort speaking to. i'm sure there's a lot of people out there tonight wondering if they're caught on those tapes. >> absolutely. the fbi restarted surveillance after getting a new feesa warrant. getting one is not easy to do. what does that tell you at the investigation. >> at the outs it means the government was able to prove to a judge that they had probable cause that paul manafort was the agent of a foreign power. the definition can encompass a lot of different activities, but typically it does indicate...

Orders, surveillance that continued until this year when manafort was still talking to the president. they also raided a storage facility of his. what are the implications of all of this? >> well, it certainly is a very aggressive investigation, much more so than is the norm for special prosecutors, certainly historically. they must see something because to get a warrant, which they've done on three occasions with manafort, they have to show probable cause that there is not only is he a foreign agent, but there's likely an he is pga auj or similar crime. so this was a pretty high standard. so ...