Field Won News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Mostly negative. now, we have taken out the small proportion of neutral reports and negative in red and positive in green, the company found that two-thirds negative coverage tore trump, for bush, for marco rubio and ben carson doing the worst at 79 percent negative. now, check out the sudden shift after the debate on thursday and friday, ben carson and donald trump leading in media attention at 30 percent each, which is a significant drop for the donald and a sizable upfor the doctor but marco rubio's coverage tripled to 20 percent and bush is up to 19 percent after going toe to toe over the ...

Nothing. in the end the greatest loss was for the american public who did not learn anything about the candidate policies or ideas. >> f took heat after the debate, and i argue those questions were more on substance than most but, joe, were ted cruz and marco rubio and donald trump justified in complaining about what donald trump called nasty questions and then pivoting to rip the mainstream media? >> absolutely. i don't even understand some of the criticism because it was is clearly bias that it was like just up there for each of the candidates to nobody out of the park, and all of them...it ...

Basically slim to none. i think in the end the greatest lot was for the american electorate who didn't learn anything about the candidates' policies or ideas. >> fox took some heat after its debate. i would argue those sequels were more on substance than many of the cnbc questions, but were they justified in complaining what trump called nasty questions, and then pivoting to rip the mainstream media? >> absolutely. i mean, absolutely. i don't even understand some of the criticism. it was so clearly biased, it was like fat pitch just sort of lobbed up there for each candidate to knock out of th...

Basically slim to none. i think in the end the greatest lot was for the american electorate who didn't learn anything about the candidates' policies or ideas. >> fox took some heat after its debate. i would argue those sequels were more on substance than many of the cnbc questions, but were they justified in complaining what trump called nasty questions, and then pivoting to rip the mainstream media? >> absolutely. i mean, absolutely. i don't even understand some of the criticism. it was so clearly biased, it was like fat pitch just sort of lobbed up there for each candidate to knock out of th...