Stay updated with breaking news from Fire chris wray. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Quote, mr. trump had at times discussed using the irs and the justice department to target others including hillary clinton, amazon ceo jeff bezos, and former cia director john brennen. joining us now is john brennen who is both the former cia director and in this apparent club of people targeted by the former president. for those who have forgotten the way in which you have very plainly critical of the former president, i ll read one of your choice tweets in march of 2018 addressed to the former president at the time. when the full extent of your vuinality, moral turpitude and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as the disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. it s reportedly these kind of ....
Weaponization of the federal government. it s like the best gaslight ever, when it seems like based on the evidence we have, republicans and conservatives didn t been weaponizing the federal government. once you say the phrase enough, whether it s the left or right, my concern is the phrase itself becomes meaningless. you lose the importance of the evidence that backs it up. republicans on the house subcommittees can talk about the weaponization of the federal government until they re blue in the face. without any evidence, it s meaningless. my worry is you say it enough, then it then becomes meaningless even when you do have evidence, as we do in this instance with donald trump and lisa page and peter strzok. does that concern you with all, that the gaslighting might be effective in the end? unfortunately, i think it. is affecting the attitudes and sentiments of many americans. watching the testimony today by chris wray, and those questions that were being lobbed at him from the rep ....
Disinformation, and now what s so popular which is victimhood. the very idea of a weaponization subcommittee is they say the government istitt)jt weaponized and those people are the victims. and victimhood gives people that they can engage in acts of political violence and those can be justified. and who s going to engage in those acts, that s something difficult for our law enforcement. i just think it s still worth unpacking, tim, what happened on the hill today and this assertion the fbi is a read out of liberals intent on targeting conservatives. it bears mentioning that fbi director chris wray is a member of the federalist society who clerked for michael luding. he is a died in the wool conservative. and i love your assessment how deep the deep state may be in the trenches of liberalism given, you know, the claims that were made on capitol hill today. ....
Readout of liberals intent on targeting conservatives. it bears mentioning that fbi director chris wray is a member of the federalist society, who clerked for michael luttig. he s a dyed in the wool conservative, and i d love your assessment about how deep the deep state might be in the trenches of liberalism given, you know, the claims made on capitol hill today. as chris wray himself said, alex, repeatedly today, the narrative that the fbi is somehow full of liberaep state, anti trump, anti conservatives is ludicrous. chris wray is a pro. i disagree with chris on a lot of issues, but i respect his integrity. as i do with all of the men and women in the fbi who, in my experience as a former prosecutor, go about their very important work with a great deal of integrity. they do make mistakes, and the ....
yeah, as chris wray himself said, alex, repeatedly today the narrative the fbi is somehow full of liberal deep state anti-trump, anti-conservatives is ludicrous. chris wray is a pro. i disagree with chris probably on a lot of issues, but i respect his integrity, as i do all of the men and women in the fbi who in my experience as a former prosecutor go about their work with a great deal of integrity. they do, though sometimes make mistakes. and the tragedy of a hearing like today we re spending all this time on these ludicrous issues of political theater and not talking about real issues about how the fbi gathers information about domestic violent extremism. do they officially share information with others. do they put first amendment restrictions on their ability to monitor open source information? or is there an assessment of danger when it comes to ....