Page 28 - Flynn Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Uncovered today? >> we learned the investigation started actually in april or between february and april of 2018 after robert mueller turned over the michael cohen investigation to the prosecutors in the southern district of new york. so up until that point, they had been investigating cohen for various financial crimes, potentially foreign money, money laundering, bank fraud and then in february of 2018, which is after you and i were sitting here first discussing the stormy daniels payment, they sent it to new york and a couple of months later prosecutors in new york revealed, okay, now we're...

Listen, there's no way we can let people see all that information we've gotten from flynn. even opposing counsel in -- representing this defendant who is on his way to trial, even opposing counsel, no, they can't see all the stuff that flynn has given the government. it is just too sensitive. it's about cases that are still ongoing. prosecutor, "your honor, we're not trying to hide the ball here at all. in addition to all of general flynn's 302s having to do specifically with this investigation, we're also willing to produce redacted portions of any 302 of the general's, of general flynn's tha...

General's, of general flynn's that were collected or made in the course of the special counsel's investigation that do relate specifically to this case. your honor, we do draw the line, though at a fishing expedition into everything else the special counsel might have been investigate. and of course it is a sensitive investigation and also there are pending investigations hat concern the subjects that would be revealed by an unfettered view of his 302s. what we are objecting to is a frolic through everything else that the special counsel's office produced in connection with entirely unrelated ...

By two days from now as it pertains to unsealing stuff from manafort's case? and why would a -- filing the special counsel's motion on that subject require, "additional time to consult within the government?" i mean, at a surface level, i don't think anybody much cares about whether we're going to get the mueller's team response about unsealing all of manafort's stuff by thursday of this week or by april 1st, which is a week and a half from now. this filing today from the special counsel's office says in fact even "the washington post" doesn't mind about this delay at all. they consent to this...

Evidence and decided, you know what? justice department policy says that we cannot prosecute a sitting president, but we're going to indict him and keep it sealed until he leaves office, would they need to keep all this stuff sealed in the way that we saw today in these documents in order to protect that future prosecution of a president? >> i would think so, yes. i mean, i'm not saying that's what's happened, but definitely i would think they would want to keep that sealed if that were the case. >> michael roth federal, one of the "wall street journal" reporters who broke this story that has ...