Forfeiting Valuable Testimony News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Threat, russia. then, the threats that she suffered, the smears she suffered, as somebody serving our country, these layers of pattern of behavior, of frankly extortion by this administration of ukraine, to interfere with our elections in order to support the president's reelection, not peace and diplomacy. it's stunning testimony and it's corroborating over and over and over again. >> the acting white house chief of staff, mick mulvaney could have just followed president trump's orders not to cooperate with the investigation. instead, mull vein nvaney asked federal court make that decision. h...

Testifying the pentagon's position was money to ukraine should flow, appropriated and authorized by the house or senate and signed into law by the president. she was told in late august ukraine might have to admit to investigating on the president's behalf in order to get that money. what's your reaction to that? >> i read, as quickly as i could, some of the synopsis of her testimony. what's damning about it, it says the president -- she testifies the president directed through the office of management and budget withholding of $990 million worth of aid to ukraine. she worried about the legali...

Administration's democratic and republican who have come forward courageously, to tell the truth about this shadow state department run by rudy guilliani, having messengers like parnas, telling folks at ukraine, if they want to get that aid congressionally authorized dollars they have to deliver, in an extortion kind of way. this is an administration in grave danger. >> how do house investigators determine who specifically gave the order to withhold the money to ukraine and why if the white house acting chief of staff, mick mulvaney, also runs the office of management and budget and others off...

To decide if or when to distribute the aid. >> the chairman of the intelligence committee, adam schiff, says, he's not waiting for the various lawsuits to play out. that could take quite a while. are democrats in the process of forfeiting valuable testimony among mick mulvaney or others that's critical? >> we're not for fitting but we're not going to wait. our judicial committee is seeking legal clarity from another co-equal branch, the judiciary, and we know that could take weeks or years, just to the benefit of this administration. we have to do both, pursue our legal remedies to get what ot...