Vimarsana
Biggest News Aggregation in the World

Page 12 - Fox Coverage News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Fox Coverage. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Fox Coverage Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:25:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:25:00

The health care issue and of the immigration issue, it's also overwhelmingly negative. there wasn't very much good news for donald trump in those two issues in the first 100 days. so to some degree, the press is reflecting what's going on out there, but again, there's shrek activity to focus primarily on what's going wrong, rather than what might be going right. >> finally we put on the screen a graph that shows the seven outlets, overall the coverage they had for president trump and people can see, cnn is at the top of the list, nbc and cbs and the times. but fox news, 52, 48 by a narrow marg...

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:24:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:24:00

Not. but it's not cater of bias. it is an cater of negative bias, the press is looking for what's going wrong in an administration. when you look at trump's first 100 days, it is more negative than clinton's or george w. bush's, but this has been a tough 100 days. i think even if you asked donald trump would you like to do it all over again, i think he would say yes, let's restart the clock. so this has been a very rough 100 days. i think press coverage reflects that. >> and to your point, if you roll out a travel ban and it gets stymied by the courts, and you can't repeal and replace obamacar...

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:23:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:23:00

These policy and leadership controversies, how big they were. they got twice as much coverage as substantive policy issues. in hillary clinton's case, her e-mails got about four times the coverage of what she was saying on all of the issues of the campaign, domestic and international. and she said a lot about the issues. so it wasn't as if she wasn't talking about them, but the press was concerned primarily about her e-mails. >> shifting to president trump's first 100 days, we'll put another graph on the screen that shows that 80% of coverage has been negative. he never had a honeymoon. the vi...

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:22:24:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:22:24:00

The press is looking for what's going wrong in an administration. when you look at trump's first 100 days, it is more negative than clinton's or george w. bush's, but this has been a tough 100 days. i think even if you asked donald trump would you like to do it all over again, i think he would say yes, let's restart the clock. so this has been a very rough 100 days. i think press coverage reflects that. >> and to your point, if you roll out a travel ban and it gets stymied by the courts, and you campaign on a pledge of repealing and replacing obamacare despite control of both houses of congres...

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:22:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170527:13:22:00

Politics. at the same time, we have the polarization, you had that wonderful tape out in montana about people's reaction to the body slam. you can see that we are polarized. a lot of that is working its way into political discourse. so it is more negative but the press is concentrating on what's going wrong. >> professor, we love to claim that we yes or arn for more substance. there's a pie chart that says coverage was 42% in the 2016 race about the horse race nature of this. only 10% of coverage was on policy. do we really want policy coverage or do we just say that? >> well, i think to a deg...