Page 13 - Future Use News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

House. >> secretary clinton, do you agree with john kerry disclosure about is less important than curbing future use and you would you agree with an agreement that did not make iran come pleen on its past activity? >> you know amy, i don't think it's useful for me to publicly comment on what the negotiations are attempting to resolve. i think i've been very clear that we must never permit iran to have a nuclear weapon. i'm very proud of the role i played in building the coalition and the sanctions that brought iran to the negotiating table. but there are a number of issues that are critically ...

The first three. one is hire great people. number two is don't run out of money. good advice. >> key. >> i think really focusing on the customer, obsessing on the customers, asking what problem are you solving for them is really good. then maybe one, a broader one is i see -- suggest people let go of their fear of failure a bit. there's always a chance that will happen. too often i see start-ups trying not to fail versus really playing to win. i'd recommend they try and do that. >> big risk, big reward. let's move on to the next question. it's about quality versus quantity. >> as a fashion r...

How big of an issue would that be for diplomats for the united states? >> i think the united states has every reason and right to act here because what secretary kerry would say at your virtual table would be this, the united states has to preserve its credibility for the world. the security council is frozen because of the cynical policies of russia and china. we then have to enforce international law on the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons. that's what the state department i think would say first. i also agree with paul that we ought to be looking second, post-strike on how to stre...

Council. how big of an issue would that be for diplomats for the united states? >> i think the united states has every reason and right to act here because what secretary carry would say at your virtual table would be this, the united states has to preserve its credibility for the world. the security council is frozen because of the cynical policies of russia and china. we then have to inforce international law on the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons that's what the state department i think would say first. i also agree with paul that we ought to be looking second, post-strike on how...

Days really makes that big a difference. really the question i have, and this is a broader question if we want to talk about the strikes in general, whether they will be did he tern to a regime entirely in survival mode and what the strikes are meant to be. is it meant to be punishment for using chemical weapons? is it meant to be a deterrent against future use of chemical weapons? one of the reasons i'm looking forward to a debate, we need to have this discussion in the united states. instead of more general discussions about how this is a humanitarian response or we americans in the united s...