Page 18 - Gps Data News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Prove alex threw the phone out when he went by there and they have no evidence of that. the evidence is the contrary. he did not. evidence supports everything that he said from the day he had that interview or the couple of days. you get onstar data, you get gps data and my gps data and you will know i'm not traveling with her phone. never got it, rode over it and now we have a guy tossing a phone in an office doesn't work for sled. not every expert says that. that's not his area of expertise. so let me see if i have hit all. oh yeah, the last one is about me. mr. waters says that i did an hbo...

Perhaps, then i do think as manu noted there's going to be a lot of pressure on kevin mccarthy on whether or not that requires additional action. >> jeff zeleny, i see you're over at cpac right now, one of two high-profile republican gatherings taking place this week. what does the list of speakers reveal to you about this growing rift we're sensing within the republican party? >> wolf, you know cpac is an annual event. but certainly every four years right before the presidential election it's a rite of passage for republican hopefuls to stop by cpac to meet these conservative act vifs visits ...

Like most veterans, i'm a huge believer in diplomacy because i understand the costs of war when diplomacy fails. and you just can't substitute going face to face. we have to talk with our adversaries. that's exactly what blinken is doing. >> you say that by ruling out f-16 fighter jets to ukraine at least for now president biden is signaling to russia he doesn't want this war to escalate. but by not providing fighter jets is the u.s. essentially allowing putin to draw a red line? >> no, i don't think he is. you have to be careful about that. that's certainly a risk. but this administration all...

Which was to have someone try to kill him so that his son buster could recover insurance proceeds. i think that's a very powerful argument for any juror sitting there having a hard time believing that this man is so monstrous that he would kill his wife and his son. here's an alternative theory. yes, he may have done something crazy, but that crazy was to try to kill himself, hire a hit man who turned out to be like a distant cousin to try to kill himself rather than kill the people that he loved the most. so i think that's a powerful argument that some jurors are going to have to wrestle with...

0 fraud he had been committing for years, the defense pointing out that doesn't make any sense, all that did was landed him in law enforcement's focus. so, what we see here is the defense trying to eat away at the prosecution's case. they did that earlier by attacking forensic evidence. they spent a lot of time talking about blood splatter evidence and why that might not be a reliable indicator of guilt. and while the prosecution has the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution, in essence, has to convince the jury on each of these points. the defense only has to make that on...