Page 10 - Guy Talking News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> and for me it really -- we talk around this all the time. we have four women and guy talking. like, until you know -- not to get all religious, the parable of the good samaritan is something to look at. what made the good samaritan good, when they saw the plirning by the road they didn't say what will happen if i help that person. they said what will happen to that person i don't help? until we have allies and people who witness this ask the question first, what will happen to that person if i don't help, we are going to be stuck in this conversation. >> absolutely. >> over and over. >> one...

Ramblings of a guy talking, and it is the way we behave as politicians in chicago or did it really amount to something as governor what the prosecution insists were acts of conspiracy, and acts of extortion, and did they prove those overt acts in court? that is what we about to find out. >> he comes from an area of the country where this kind of corruption has been indeen ende the past, and has that context helped him? >> no, it has not, and that is part of the dilemma for the jury sitting back there, and i hope we will find out that the jurors are resonant to talk in highly publicized cases, ...

Have a provision similar to arizona's that allows a law enforcement or a mental health professional who believes that someone is a danger to him or herself or others to confine that individual in a hospital type facility for generally up to 72 hours. >> bill: okay, then what happens after that? >> after the 72 hours, if the threat is purr received to still be ongoing, then generally the person has to be brought before a judge who has to make a finding that the danger exists and then the hold period can be extended. there is always -- we're always trying to balance with these public policies th...

Effective player in washington, d.c. but he's divisive and i know he works with republicans and democrats. i know progressives think he's too modest. but he's a divisive guy. you go back and look at what he said during his years in the house of representatives. he said unkind things about republicans, about general petraeus. for a guy talking about hope and change and bringing people together, it's unusual to have him as your chief of staff. >> what about this peter rouse? >> he's not rahm. he's a much different guy. he's close to the president which is clearly one of the reasons he was picked...