Live Breaking News & Updates on He Duty Of The Ombudsman To Promptly Act On Complaints Brought Before Its Office Should Not Be Mistaken Witha Hasty Resolution Cases At Expense Thoroughness And Correctness

Sandiganbayan (File photo) MANILA - The Sandiganbayan turned down the plea of former Maguindanao governor Datu Sajid Islam Uy Ampatuan to dismiss the charges against him over alleged irregularities in agrarian projects in 2009. The anti-graft court's Third Division denied for lack of merit the motion for reconsideration filed by Ampatuan's lawyers on March 8. Ampatuan claimed he suffered mental anguish and had been prejudiced by the undue delay in the prosecution of the cases for malversation and violation of Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act) regarding alleged irregularities in 22 projects of farm-to-market roads worth PHP500 million in 2009. Ampatuan claimed that since he was detained in 2009, the police and the military took over the provincial capitol and seized all records which he claimed are "crucial to refute the claims against him". In 2015, the Field Investigation Office of the Office of the Ombudsman finished its inquiry and filed ....

Datu Sajid Islam , Third Division , Field Investigation Office Of The , Datu Sajid Islam Uy Ampatuan , Republic Act , Corrupt Practices Act , Field Investigation Office , Sandiganbayan File Photo Manila The Turned Down Plea Of Former Maguindanao Governor Datu Sajid Islam Uy Ampatuan To Dismiss Charges Against Him Over Alleged Irregularities In Agrarian Projects 2009 Anti Graft Court 39s Third Division Denied For Lack Merit Motion Reconsideration Filed By Lawyers On March 8 Claimed He Suffered Mental Anguish And Had Been Prejudiced Undue Delay Prosecution Cases Malversation Violation Republic Act No 3019 Corrupt Practices Regarding 22 Farm Market Roads Worth Php500 Million That Since Was Detained , He Police And The Military Took Over Provincial Capitol Seized All Records Which Claimed Are Quot Crucial To Refute Claims Against Him In 2015 , He Field Investigation Office Of The Ombudsman Finished Its Inquiry And Fileda Complaint Before Omb On Jan 12 , 016 The Criminal Cases Were Filed Before Sandiganbayan On Feb 14 , 020 Quot It Also Bears Noting That The Records Are Bereft Of Any Showing There Wasa Deliberate Attempt On Part Ombudsman To Delay Case In Order Gain Some Tactical Advantage Over Accused , Uot The Court Said Ina Resolution Dated April 4 And Uploaded Recently Quot Ultimately , He Duty Of The Ombudsman To Promptly Act On Complaints Brought Before Its Office Should Not Be Mistaken Witha Hasty Resolution Cases At Expense Thoroughness And Correctness , Uot It Added Pna ,