Page 4 - Heller Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Needed the supreme court in order to help him win. with this effort to subvert the results of the election. that he was happen that he had three nominees on the court at that time and one of the challenges that made it to the supreme court, justice thomas did sit in on, so this is really clear to say this isn't just about spouses of supreme court justices being able to support whatever candidate they want or engage in political activity, that they can do it's about disclosing it and having a consequence for that justice that might say, you can't participate given the conflict of interest there...

Five, six years, these norms that aren't laws. a norm for the supreme court that these guys -- observe ethics rules they need to have rules. >> people like senators calling for legislation ethics rules for years. why do you think that's never happened? >> nobody likes to have other people police them. the supreme court are the head of the third branch of government. they're like gods and they don't want to have these things tying them down. they need to. they need to have term limits, too, if you ask me. >> we often talk about the loss of faith the public has in the supreme court as an institu...

Bear arms in the home for self-defense. but commonsense restrictions on that right from municipalities and states to pass statutes for their skate. the current supreme court don't believe in that. they're highly interested in drastically and dramatically expanding that second amendment well beyond any reasonable interpretation of it. we're poise to see the logical extrapolation of that idea with this case that's arising out of the 5th circuit. the supreme court could presumably side with domestic abusers to continue to have a gun. that will further shock the conscience of the country but it go...

Citizens? no, i wouldn't. that argument doesn't wash with me. and i mean the threat of mass kills it's not just the people killed, it's it's impact on our society. and what's frustrating is, it's the wrong legal outcome from the supreme court of the united states that heller decision is a bad outcome. i tried to explain that in the opening part of the program, and we have got a weak congress afraid to confront the gun lobby. you have heard this before. that's why i said i guess we are going to have to learn to live with it. what else came in in terms of social media? the foremost ignored words...

Wheels and realize this is the price we pay for living in the united states mostly because of the enshrinement of our gun culture as the second amendment has been interpreted by the supreme court. the second amendment reads as follows a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. i think it's pretty straightforward that those 27 words are not to be farced and must be read as a complete thought. immediately post revolutionary war, the idea was that militias needed to keep and bear arms. otherwise, ...