Serious lawyer he has the sole distinction of being a political hack. The attack on our nations capitol on january 6th, 2021, was unprecedented assault on the seat of american democracy. Since the attack on our capitol, the department of justice has remained committed to ensuring accountability for those criminally responsible for what happened that day. This case has brought consistent with that commitment. Laura ha. Well, by listening to this guy, you would think that trump himself was smashing flew the glass at the capitol that day. That was one of the most item go jake presentations i have ever seen in a high profile Criminal Case anyone who listened to that. Any normal person alleged donalp carried out the capitol riot. In order to get a conviction, he will have to use material, that, in my view, is clearly protected by the First Amendment. Laura now, this case should never survive a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment. But will judge tonya shut kin, an obama judge, e
presidential election by using knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct the government function by which those results are collected, counted and second certified. knowingly. who out there believes that trump didn t believe that this was a fraudulent outcome? i have never seen trump equivocate on that. i havener heard him equivocate on his opinion. but knowingly so everyone out there is not a lawyer, that is the intent that is required to charge someone under this statute. knowingly how hard is that to prove? oh, it s very hard. and, in this case it s going to be even harder. because even trump s biggest adversaries will admit that he does truly believe that there was fraud in this election. he believed this then and he believes it today. not only are they going to have to prove that he knew that there was no fraud.