Page 14 - Human Involvement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> something intention happened prior to it crashing. when we talk about the a-cart being turned off and then right in the small session of when there is no communication available the aircraft makes turn and we are told that is based on input into the a pilot system. that tells us it was human involvement. we see a primary blip on the radar and that tells us the transponder was turned off and stayed off. it wasn't failure. it stayed off at that altitude. i am less concerned about the

Altitude changes because we are dealing a non-transponder case so judging the altitude isn't science. the difference could be something that would be much more dichfficult to determine a it could be an error. >> you are left with all of these hours, right? if you go back to the one theory it might have been a suicide issue, you are left with all of the hours the plane flew. that leaves you with the unconscio unconscious theory or the pane stuart theory. >> that part we'll not know for a while until and unless we find the black boxes. if human involvement can be the

The hijack code. they put nothing in there accept it was turned off so it has to lead one to the inference that it was a human involvement in this and it has to be a hijacking or a stolen aircraft. >> mike? >> no, i have to agree entirely. and for safety's sake we have to assume that going forward if someone has this airplane and that's a real stretch, and wants to do something with it, sometime in the next 12 months, they might do something with it. we need to look into those options. but i have to agree with the lawyer, it doesn't look good. we can make excuses but there's too many points he...

The hijack code. they put nothing in there accept it was turned off so it has to lead one to the inference that it was a human involvement in this and it has to be a hijacking or a stolen aircraft. >> mike? >> no, i have to agree entirely. and for safety's sake we have to assume that going forward if someone has this airplane and that's a real stretch, and wants to do something with it, sometime in the next 12 months, they might do something with it. we need to look into those options. but i have to agree with the lawyer, it doesn't look good. we can make excuses but there's too many points he...

They put nothing in there except it was turned off. so again it has to lead one to the inference that it was a human involvement in this and it has to be a hijacking or a stolen aircraft. >> mike? >> no, i have to agree entirely. and for safety's sake we have to assume that going forward if someone has this airplane, and that is a real stretch and wants to do something with it, sometime in the next 12 months they may do something with it, we need to look into those options. but i have to agree with the lawyer. it doesn't look good. we can make excuses, but there are too many points here that j...