avenue that would get him the, i think it have some interest in it. but the viability question, with no labels, ballot access. he s sick the unpredictability go toe-to-toe to stick it to donald trump, what the threat of actually giving it to donald trump. if you look at the four party members, they re not insignificant. they are clearly an issue, potentially, and this campaign, in general. rfk junior, 20%. cornell west, 14. jill stein, chris christie, someone else, i m not sure. that s incredibly volatile. for the stage of the game. when you are talking about an incumbent president and a former president. i ve noticed in the polling, too. it s a bit over the place. but it seems that when they include third-party cadence, first of. all lot of times, these polls, four different third-party names out there. and that names don t actually mean anything to people but that the come at none of the above, of like trump, i don t
athletes, the way we are going to arrive in paris will not necessarily in itself be affected by this decision, but those we have a long standing plan that will enable our athletes to get there in their best prepared status, but our athletes and many other disabled people, when they are living their lives off the field, are undoubtedly affected by not having a voice at the centre of government and in the centre of many of the decisions around how people live their lives, and disabled people do deserve a minister of state. and disabled people do deserve a minister of state. there has been so much progress minister of state. there has been so much progress made, minister of state. there has been so much progress made, first minister of state. there has been so much progress made, first of- minister of state. there has been so much progress made, first of all, i much progress made, first of all, in the paralympic movement but also just generally for people with disabilities. so how
clear. and i think using those words, you know, he s very specific when he says palestinian civilians must be allowed to return home as soon as safely as soon as safely possible. and they will not, they should not be leaving gaza as someone in the far-right in israel said. first of, alternative gaza, simply because no country will accept them. second, they do have legitimate right to no longer be internally displaced people but to go back to their homes. there are some people in the far right of the israeli government that don t believe that this is the final time to cleanse gaza of, quote, palestinians. but that just won t happen. i feel like we would cut off funding to israel before we allowed them t and eliminate all the people that are legitimately living there. another aspect to the question and answer period i thought was fascinating, tony blinken was asked straight up
that is agreement, but without a veto. so that is our agreement, but without a veto. so that is our position. yes, i look forward that is our position. yes, i look forward to that is our position. yes, i look forward to the moment when this conflict forward to the moment when this conflict is forward to the moment when this conflict is over. and of course, we spend conflict is over. and of course, we spend a conflict is over. and of course, we spend a lot conflict is over. and of course, we spend a lot of time asking what israel spend a lot of time asking what israel should do next to bring this to an israel should do next to bring this to an end. israel should do next to bring this to an end, we should also spend a nanosecond to an end, we should also spend a nanosecond saying, if hamas wanted, they could nanosecond saying, if hamas wanted, they could end this tomorrow, they could they could end this tomorrow, they could lay they could end this tomorrow, the