Page 44 - Immunity Argument News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Supreme court. >> this is a huge development with the president's personal lawyers asking the supreme court to block the subpoena looking for the president's tax returns and financial records over several years. this is a subpoena from the manhattan d.a.'s office. the lawyers for the president are arguing he is am mun. they're making a broad immunity argument he is immann from such a subpoena and from criminal prosecution while he is in office. if the supreme court decides to take this up and makes a decision it would be a landmark ruling that dogged the president since the day he took office ...

Hey! do you know you can get unlimited talk and text on america's best 4g lte networks for $20, no contract? unlimited talk? i like that! because on sundays you know i gotta talk to mama, then on... this is your wake-up call, people. the new tracfone wireless. now you're in control. in politics, what was once said as a joke we then candidate is being used as part of a legal argument by his attorney in federal court, the lawyer saying the president should be immune to prosecution while in office and even telling the judge that would still apply if president trump shot someone on fifth avenue ...

According to democrats, the white house objected to her answering not one, not even ten, not even 50 -- 155 different questions. in doing so, hicks asserted absolute immunity. but let's be clear about what absolute immunity really is. it's about as real as the word covfefe, but she got away with it. no consequences. democratic house judiciary chairman jerry nadler did push back a little on those assertions. let me be fair. but did anyone truly take hicks or the team of lawyers to task for stonewalling? no. only after the fact chairman nadler said he could destroy the white house's immunity arg...

Questions. in doing so, hicks asserted absolute immunity. but let's be clear about what absolute immunity really is. it's about as real as the word covfefe, but she got away with it. no consequences. democratic house judiciary chairman jerry nadler did push back a little on those assertions. let me be fair. but did anyone truly take hicks or the team of lawyers to task for stonewalling? no. only after the fact chairman nadler said he could destroy the white house's immunity argument in court. but he could have done that in the hearing. why didn't he try to fight harder? in his own hearing, whe...

Argument in court. i guess my question is when? when? >> well, i think you're going to see a number of things happening very quickly and i do think that the immunity argument is ludicrous. i think it will get destroyed. we just hope that it is destroyed extremely quickly. so when we go to court and i do believe that will be very soon, we will then, you know, ask for the judge to rule quickly because obviously this is a critical issue, this is a crisis situation, and we have to be able to get the information that we seek. >> was there any rational given why she wouldn't answer where she sat in ...