Impeachment Inquiry Procedures News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

We dont know how they were using this money is not factually true. You heard mcclk chin tok saying he had the mcclintock saying that he had the prosecutor fired. Yet those talking points are respited despite the fact theyre not based on fact. Its an important moment. I want to get your sense of the history of what were about to see. You see the members showing up, the staff, theyre showing up. The witnesses will be there. Theyll be sworn in as well. Its a moment that doesnt happen very often if american history. It doesnt and it shouldnt. Because its so important you think about the the way co...

Whether you think thats good or bad and matches the abuse of powers is an open question. And then he goes through and argues he doesnt see what he calls a statutory crime. And well see that debate as well. There are people youre going to hear from who are going to say its got to be an actual felony and then there are going to be other people pointing out the constitution doesnt require that. It has words like treason, bribery and high crimes. So were going to get into the weeds here, but the big picture is keep your eye on which witnesses and exchanges are talking about the serious question of...

>> everyone voted. has everyone voted who wishes to vote? >> miss bass. >> misbass votes aye. >> the clerk will report. >> mr. chairman, there are 24 aye, 17 nos. >> the motion to table is agreed to. >> mr. chairman, i have a parliamentary inquiry. >> the gentleman will state his parliamentary inquiry. >> thank you, mr. chairman. clause c 2 of the judiciary impeachment inquiry procedures states that members of the committee can raise objections relating to the admissibility of testimony and evidence, but it doesn't say what rules apply to admissibility. so i'm hoping you can explain to us what...

Proper. >> i'm asking for the rule of explanation. >> we'll apply the rules, period. >> you won't help us understand that? there is no clarity there. >> how are you citing that? >> the impeachment inquiry procedures. >> how is that unclear? >> it's the rules of the house and they will be applied, period. >> i'm asking how will they be applied here, sir. >> applied according to the rules. >> but not answering your question. a circular response. thank you. can you please also it rate the schedule going forward? do you plan additional hearings? >> gentleman will suspend. that's not a proper parli...

>> you stated a rule. you cannic nor it and not answer it but you can't say it's not proper. >> i'm asking for the application of the rule and an explanation. >> we will apply the rules, period. >> you won't help us understand that? >> there's no clarity there. >> which rule are you citing? how are you citing? >> clause c 2 of the judiciary committee's impeachment inquiry procedures. >> how is that unclear? >> it's the rules of the house and they will be applied, period. >> i'm asking how will they be applied here, sir? >> they will be applied according to the rules. >> but not answer your que...