Page 3 - Information Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Wake of this, the statement. we have no way what was said, the speaker hopes for a full explanation of the facts from the administration. david sanger, that's not exactly standing behind the president right now either. >> not exactly true either. >> first of all, we don't know what was said. this is knowable when they have these meetings there are note takers. there's sometimes a transcript. it's not clear whether this was taped or not, but that goes back to the broader question of last week raised by the president's tweet whether he's taping encounters in the oval office. a question shawn spa...

Loss of life in russian aviation history. i think russia should know information like this. the question is not whether the president told them, but whether we tell the service that gave it to us that we're going to tell the russians. in my world that is a huge oversight. you cannot give information away that's given to the united states as a courtesy by another government and not bother to tell them first. that is simply reckless. >> ron brownstein. it does not seem there's a constructive legal case to make he here. it's not illegal if the president does it. poppy does it, secretary of state ...

Whatever the president revealed wasn't widely disseminated in the u.s. government as other officials looked at the conversations with foreign minister lavrov. i think the key word here that we've heard this morning and actually came from senator corker is one of discipline. the question is when the president encounters foreign leaders, is he so determined to describe how cool the intelligence is that he gets each day, something he apparently boasted about, that he goes too far in allowing them to intuit where it came from. discipline has so far not been the hall mark of this administration. >>...

And cnn military analyst lew eternal general mark hurtling. let me begin with you, some reporting by earthquake and his team lays out a little more detail in terms of who this ally was and why it was so important to the united states in terms of this information sharing dpreem. they say it's a middle eastern ally. this ally warned united states apparently upon giving this information and this intelligence don't tell anyone, don't even share widely among u.s. intelligence, the u.s. intelligence community. and if you disclose this to too many people, if you share too widely, we will stop helping...

The question the white house has never sufficiently answered is why it took so long to act after the warning that the acting attorney general provided. of course the action only came after the underlying question was revealed in the "washington post." it really goes back, chris, to this core issue. we've talked about this before. on election day, between a fifth and a quarter of the people who voted for donald trump said they were uncertain he had the temperament or the qualifications to serve as president. they want to change, they were willing to take a changes. certainly what happened over ...