Inquiry Open News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Strategy his deputy is following which says a judge should help me make this decision. i've been told by the white house not to talk, by the house to talk. i would like a court to decide for me. my guess is john bolton would follow that ruling if there was one to be had. so he's the one people look most forward to hearing from. >> yes. >> as long as we hear from him soon, we'll see some momentum going on this inquiry. >> let's talk momentum. you've written a book and the momentum for the democrats on this inquiry is moving a lot faster than impeachment inquiries in the past. look at this. when...

Has been reactive on this. >> katie: dagen, nadler is facing a primary from the left in his district. so he's trying to push this forward and being very dishonest when he calls it "official impeachment proceedings while not actually having an official inquiry open. >> katie: this is his life calling, in terms of elected office. that's what's going on here. i thought the whole plane was going to be that they would have bob mueller testify, and he was going to explain to the american people why impeachment proceedings were necessary. and that fell flat on its face. it went nowhere. he actually i...

Engaged in unconstitutional policing. he is a disgrace to law enforcement. >> the th is what tis is what t said today. >> i thought he was treated unbelievably unfairly when they came down with their about big decision to go get him right before the election voting started. as you know. and he lost in fairly close election. he would have won the election. but they just hammered him just before the election. i thought that was a very, very unfair thing to do. >> was is it politically motivated. >> of course not. why don't we talk about the facts, chris. initial inquiry open in june of 2008 unde...

Before the election. i thought that was a very, very unfair thing to do. >> was is it politically motivated. >> of course not. why don't we talk about the facts, chris. initial inquiry open in june of 2008 under the watch of george w. bush. when we investigated, one of the reasons we didn't release ourer of findings until december of 2011 was because they fought us tooth and nail. they wouldn't give us access to information. we had to go to court and file a lawsuit to get access to information. and so, 2011 was when we issued our let are of findings. so this cased eight or nine-year shelf life...

Reach -- can't do the work, to a degree that it inspires confidence in both parties. that seems to be a real question now. because a month ago when these bipartisan investigations were announced, that was cnn's sign of hope by both parties. but you barely started the investigations and both parties are accusing the other of being biased in effect, as they started. eliminating lines of inquiry or keeping lines of inquiry open that the others do not believe is a reasonable line of inquiry. just another point on that distinction between "the times" story and our own reporting. "times" said contac...