Page 39 - Instructing News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> the gospel of mary suggests that mary's relationship with jesus is resented by peter. >> once mary's finished instructing a full-scale argument breaks out between mary and peter. >> to us. >> what do you think? that i made this up in my heart because i am learning about the savior? >> this is clearly a fight for who is going to be a chief disciple and who carries on jesus's teachers. >> he may have felt it was his rightful role and maybe the fact that he was a man more than any other factor. >> the conclusion of this gospel is that mary is the primary disciple more than peter. and that she ...

Of the risen christ, "my lord and my god," is one of the most important christian confessions of faith. >> it's the only place in the new testament where christ is called god. that, i think, is incredibly significant. >> because you have now seen me, you believe. blessed are those who have not seen me yet still believe. >> this is the only appearance to a specific disciple for the purpose of instructing someone in particular. jesus has appeared so that thomas will know that he is really resurrected from the dead. >> then in the gospels, thomas disappears. is it possible he undertook an epic jo...

>> thomas' proclamation in front of the risen christ, "my lord and my god," is one of the most important christian confessions of faith. >> it's the only place in the new testament where christ is called god. that, i think, is incredibly significant. >> because you have now seen me, you believe. blessed are those who have not seen me yet still believe. >> this is the only appearance to a specific disciple for the purpose of instructing someone in particular. jesus has appeared so that thomas will know that he is really resurrected from the dead. >> then in the gospels, thomas disappears. is it...

Their background, but one of the things the judge asks each and err one of them, okay, you put it all aside and just focus on the evidence? why should it be any different for our senators? why shouldn't they be able to put aside their party view and listen to the evidence? also, you're only going get that way if you're actually able to present evidence. a trial without evidence is an absolutely toothless charade. right? it's nothing for the senators to actually dig into vote on. so they need both evidence and absolutely like you said, they should be able to take the same standard as a regular ...

A trial without evidence is an absolutely toothless charade. right? it's nothing for the senators to actually dig into vote on. so they need both evidence and absolutely like you said, they should be able to take the same standard as a regular criminal trial. thinking may be more of a political question than a legal question, but if this trial happens and the president is ultimately i quitted, does it hurt him that he does not get a fair trial, that he gets a sham process, that he just runs around town or across country saying he has been acquitted when everyone knows it was not fair? >> i thi...