Intelligence Bureaucracy News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Doesn't mean there's not room for criticism, doesn't mean for instance there's not room to explore rudy's role as a foreign policy person or the classification issue, did they do it to avoid leaks, do they do it regularly or is it something where someone in the white house thought this call doesn't have the optics we don't like. i'm not seeing anything that rings as criminal. the problem with impeachment is impeachment is whatever the hell congress says it is. they can pretty much call things abuse of power, betrayal of this that, or the other or mafia impersonation and they can probably go fo...

Doesn't mean there's not room for criticism, doesn't mean for instance there's not room to explore rudy's role as a foreign policy person or the classification issue, did they do it to avoid leaks, do they do it regularly or is it something where someone in the white house thought this call doesn't have the optics we don't like. i'm not seeing anything that rings as criminal. the problem with impeachment is impeachment is whatever the hell congress says it is. they can pretty much call things abuse of power, betrayal of this that, or the other or mafia impersonation and they can probably go fo...

Of this report puts him. >> joining us now, frank figliuzzi, former assistant director for counterintelligence at the feb and at the table nbc news correspondent carol lee. carol, i want to ask you this question, who is this man, mr. ratcliffe, who will now be the most powerful person in our intelligence bureaucracy? >> as you pointed out, he's a strong supporter of president trump. he was elected to the house in 2014. he comes from a very, very republican district. one of the most republican in the house. he's served on the intelligence committee but he doesn't have the kind of background we ...

Sanctions and it can do more of that and continue trade with north korea and they were empowered and emboldened to do that by the fact the president met with kim jong un in this summit which got so much attention but didn't produce anything. the other winter in this is dan coats said he didn't believe north korea really intended to give up nuclear weapons, the president disagree with him, said he was wrong but it turns out he was right. shannon: i hear you laughing. >> dan coats is the head of the intelligence bureaucracy, he says maybe north korea doesn't want to give up its weapons and maybe...

To the kind of resolution that i think a lot of the public would like to see right now. >> tucker: but the ideas that this was intentional, this wasn't what it purports to be, which is an effort to gather facts about what or did or did not happen but it was a trap. >> yeah. i think a very important thing to remember as try to remind people and i do in this piece in the federalist that the dossier itself was produced by an opposition research firm. >> tucker: yes. >> fusion gps. even though they had a spy. they had a spy out there doing it, this was not the product of an intelligence bureaucrac...