Page 2 - Is Unknowable News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

So how did the new yorker come up with the details? a friend gave the magazine eight handwritten pages. >> she wrote a detailed chronicle of the a fair in selling the story. >> it did sell to the national inquiry for $150,000 days before the election. according to the wall street street journal hand new yorker. why didn't you read it? because the inquiry did not publish the story. but by paying for it legally blocked anyone else, including her, from coming out with details. they have made no comment on that part of the story. >> we have reached out to karen mc-dougal for more things, sexual se...

Elections. yes, we should do that regardless whether the president wants to deny what everybody else knows. >> certainly we look at the house and that investigation is quite the mess right now but on the senate side there still is a bipartisan investigation we're watching. i do want to ask you -- >> that's an investigation of the past. what i'm saying is they have to have -- >> for the future. >> the willingness to protect us going forward. >> i wonder -- i know you've seen the president's written statement that came from the white house. it warnings that far fetched theories and false allegat...

Out information like, for example right here, not my president. after the election, clearly intended to divide america and bring american democracy to its knees, in my judgment clearly also so putin could continue inventions in places like crimea. the fact that the hill committees couldn't have a conversation about the hijacking of our democracy in the past year in light of this indictment, it couldn't be starker. incredible. >> what do you think about that? >> i think phil's right. look, this document lays out a case for the kind of interference in our election that we have never seen before,...

I don't know how you can read the document and not draw that conclusion. the last thing i'd say about what the president has said and what i draw from this document, he went on to make other allegations about the document. for example, it lets him off the hook. i mentioned earlier on the election and in other areas, most of what he spoke about in his tweet i didn't find in the document. i can't correspond what i read today and one of the most intelligent documents i've read with the president saying there's no collusion. it doesn't address collusion. it addresses the russians. >> it's a good p...

Expect. it condemns the findings about russia here, but the tweet, let's look at the tweet from president trump. it says russia started their anti-u.s. campaign in 2014, long before i announced that i would run for president. the results of the election were not impacted. the trump campaign did nothing wrong, no collusion. what strikes so many people who follow these kinds of things is that the president doesn't condemn russia. normally you would expect we would be reporting on the internal deliberations of how the u.s. would retaliate against russia because of this and there's none of that. >...