Stay updated with breaking news from Isnt making us. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Prove you are an idiot. you ve long ago done that. james, you could stop pretending you do not see the folly of washington s fingerpointing. we are way past debating that, and by the way ralph in cupertino, california. i m all for fast food paying the bill. it beats me paying the bill. evelyn via yahoo! scapegoating, that s all it is, politicians trying to find scapegoats for personal responsibility. mcdonald s isn t making us fat, we are, but it s far easier to go after someone else s cash or raise a credit line to get cash than ever try to save the taxpayers some cash. evelyn, you said it far better than i ever could or ever have. tania e-mails, ronald mcdonald would a bigger guy they would be kicking the buns of some other guy. kevin in atlanta, the debt is a lot like a double quarter pounder, the more you eat, the more you want, the sicker you get before you die. ....
One-sided so i think that would be one of the recommendations that seemed one of the most possible out of the 46 that the five memberses of the panels put out there. of course, sam you heard michael leiter and there is resistance from the intelligence committee and listen from the select committee on it and this is saxby chambliss on morning joe today. we had public the fact that there are 64 instances that we interrupted and disrupted from a potential attack standpoint. does the death of another 2,000 americans have to happen before we step in and say, well, you know, hey? but in the conclusion of this report was this isn t making us significantly safer, but is there still the fear of a terror attack that could trump these privacy concerns? well, yeah. it s interesting because it s not as if the panel will which is packed with civil libertarians and these are ....
Isn t making us safer, if there s a problem with this, what are those of you with oversight doing about it? what can you do about it? we have done incredible oversight. unfortunately, tsa was taken from the transportation committee after we created it, put in homeland security. so it s in an agency that gin combines 22 other agencies and they have an army that s built to 65,000 people, bigger than cabinet agencies. you have a lot of bureaucrats trying to justify their existence, not wanting to reform the system and make it risk-based. i d love to tell you and i can tell you that classified results of the pat-downs or this new equipment, and i would defy tsa to release some of that information as it becomes dated and isn t a security risk, and then people would see what security theater and what a charade is going on at great public expense. congressman john mica, thank ....